A conserved helix 2 Asp is required for the proper function of many G-protein-coupled receptors. To reveal the structural basis for the role of this residue, the additive effects of mutations at this locus and at a conserved helix 7 locus were investigated in the 5-HT2A receptor. All mutant receptors studied retained high affinity agonist and antagonist binding. Whereas an Asp-->Asn mutation in helix 2 eliminated coupling, interchanging the residues at the two positions by a second mutation of Asn-->Asp in helix 7 restored receptor function. These data suggest that these residues are adjacent in space and interact. The loss of function observed with Ala at either position is consistent with each side chain forming hydrogen bonds. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed on three-dimensional computational models of agonist-receptor complexes of both the wild-type receptor and the Asp-->Asn mutant receptor. Consonant with the lack of coupling observed for the mutant construct, introducing the mutation into the computational model produced a conformational change in a direction opposite to that seen from computational simulations of activation of the wild-type receptor model. These results implicate both loci in a common hydrogen-bonding network underlying receptor activation by agonist.
The decapeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone controls reproductive function via interaction with a heptahelical G protein-coupled receptor. Because of molecular model of the receptor predicts that Lys121 in the third transmembrane helix contributes to the binding pocket, the function of this side chain was studied by site-directed mutagenesis. Substitution of Arg at this position preserved high affinity agonist binding, whereas Gln at this position reduced binding below the limits of detection. Leu and Asp at this locus abolished both binding and detectable signal transduction. The EC50 of concentration-response curves for coupling to phosphatidyl inositol hydrolysis obtained with the Gln121 receptor was more than 3 orders of magnitude higher than that obtained for the wild-type receptor. In order to determine whether the increased EC50 obtained with this mutant reflects an altered receptor affinity, the effect of decreases in wild-type receptor density on concentration-response curves was determined by irreversible antagonism. Progressively decreasing the concentration of the wild-type receptor increased the EC50 values obtained to a maximal level of 2.4 +/- 0.2 nM. Comparison of this value with the EC50 of 282 +/- 52 nM observed with the Gln121 receptor mutant indicates that the agonist affinity for this mutant is reduced more than 100-fold. In contrast, antagonist had comparable high affinities for the wild-type, Arg121, and Gln121 mutants. The results indicate that a charge-strengthened hydrogen bond donor is required at this locus for high affinity agonist binding but not for high affinity antagonist binding.
Mutation of Asp(2.61(98)) at the extracellular boundary of transmembrane helix 2 of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor decreased the affinity for GnRH. Using site-directed mutagenesis, ligand modification, and computational modeling, different side chain interactions of Asp(2.61(98)) that contribute to high-affinity binding were investigated. The conservative Asp(2. 61(98))Glu mutation markedly decreased the affinity for a series of GnRH analogues containing the native His(2) residue. This mutant showed smaller decreases in affinity for His(2)-substituted ligands. The loss of preference for His(2)-containing ligands in the mutant receptor shows that Asp(2.61(98)) determines the specificity for His(2). Analysis of the affinities of a series of position 2-substituted ligands suggests that a hydrogen bond forms between Asp(2.61(98)) and the delta NH group of His(2) and that Asp(2. 61(98)) forms a second hydrogen bond with the ligand. Substitution of Asp(2.61(98)) with an uncharged residue further decreased the affinity for all ligands and also decreased receptor expression. Computational modeling indicates an intramolecular ionic interaction of Asp(2.61(98)) with Lys(3.32(121)) in transmembrane helix 3. The uncharged, Lys(3.32(121))Gln mutation also markedly decreased agonist affinity. The modeling and the similar phenotypes of mutants with uncharged substitutions for Asp(2.61(98)) or Lys(3.32(121)) are consistent with the presence of this helix 2-helix 3 interaction. These studies support a dual role for Asp(2.61(98)): formation of an interhelical interaction with Lys(3.32(121)) that contributes to the structure of the agonist binding pocket and an interaction with His(2) of GnRH that helps stabilize agonist complexing.
Structural microdomains of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) consist of spatially related side chains that mediate discrete functions. The conserved helix 2/helix 7 microdomain was identified because the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor appears to have interchanged the Asp 2.50 and Asn 7.49 residues which are conserved in transmembrane helices 2 and 7 of rhodopsin-like GPCRs. We now demonstrate that different side chains of this microdomain contribute specifically to receptor expression, heterotrimeric G protein-, and small G protein-mediated signaling. An Asn residue is required in position 2.50(87) for expression of the GnRH receptor at the cell surface, most likely through an interaction with the conserved Asn 1.50 (53) residue, which we also find is required for receptor expression. Most GPCRs require an Asp side chain at either the helix 2 or helix 7 locus of the microdomain for coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins, but the GnRH receptor has transferred the requirement for an acidic residue from helix 2 to 7. However, the presence of Asp at the helix 7 locus precludes small G protein-dependent coupling to phospholipase D. These results implicate specific components of the helix 2/helix 7 microdomain in receptor expression and in determining the ability of the receptor to adopt distinct activated conformations that are optimal for interaction with heterotrimeric and small G proteins.The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) 1 receptor belongs to the rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) (1). This family includes the light-sensitive opsins, protease-activated receptors, and receptors for neurotransmitters, peptides, and glycoproteins. High resolution structural data have not yet been obtained for any GPCR. However, projection maps of rhodopsin, amino acid sequence alignment, and computational modeling indicate that GPCRs have 7 membrane-spanning ␣-helices (2-6). There is a high degree of homology within the transmembrane helices and certain amino acids are highly conserved throughout the family (2, 3, 7). This diverse family shares the common function of propagating a signal across lipid membranes and the amino acid side chains which are conserved among the GPCRs are likely to constitute key structural motifs which subserve this universal GPCR function. Several models of GPCRs, including the GnRH receptor (4, 8), have been constructed as aids for investigating receptor structure-function relations. Molecular models of GPCRs can be used to integrate experimental observations and generate structural hypotheses. However, the complexity of these structures and the limited number of experimentally determined constraints can lead to inconsistent behavior of the models (4, 7). To overcome these limitations, we have pursued the approach of identifying discrete structural motifs within receptor models, which might constitute functional microdomains. The microdomains are characterized in detail and subsequently incorporated into whole receptor models. In the GnRH receptor, for exa...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.