No abstract

Our study concerns contact sensitization in children, the frequency of which is still debated in the literature, even though specific reports are increasing. During a 7 year period (1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994) 670 patients, 6 months to 12 years of age, were patch tested with the European standard series, integrated with 24 haptens, at the same concentrations as for adults. We observed positive results in 42% of our patients. Thimerosal, nickel sulfate, Kathon CG, fragrance mix, neomycin, wool alcohols, and ammoniated mercury induced most of the positive responses. The highest sensitization rate was found in children from 0 to 3 years of age.Comments on main positive haptens are reported. Seventy-seven percent of our sensitized patients were atopics, suggesting that atopy represents a predisposing factor for contact hypersensitivity. Patch testing represents a useful diagnostic procedure for the definition of childhood eczematous dermatitis and for the identification of agents inducing contact sensitization which is frequently associated with atopic dermatitis.Allergic contact dermatitis in children is no longer considered rare and specific reports in the literature are increasing (1-23). However, so far, the real frequency of contact sensitization in children has not been thoroughly investigated, since patients with dermatitis in this age group are not routinely patch tested.Moreover, it is sometimes difficult to compare the results of studies dealing with contact dermatitis in children, owing to differences both in the selection criteria and age of patients, and in the choice of test substances, their concentration, and the duration of the patch test application.In this study we illustrate the results obtained by patch testing pediatric patients during a 7 year period in the

Our study concerns contact sensitization in children, the frequency of which is still debated in the literature, even though specific reports are increasing. During a 7 year period (1988-1994) 670 patients, 6 months to 12 years of age, were patch tested with the European standard series, integrated with 24 haptens, at the same concentrations as for adults. We observed positive results in 42% of our patients. Thimerosal, nickel sulfate, Kathon CG, fragrance mix, neomycin, wool alcohols, and ammoniated mercury induced most of the positive responses. The highest sensitization rate was found in children from 0 to 3 years of age. Comments on main positive haptens are reported. Seventy-seven percent of our sensitized patients were atopics, suggesting that atopy represents a predisposing factor for contact hypersensitivity. Patch testing represents a useful diagnostic procedure for the definition of childhood eczematous dermatitis and for the identification of agents inducing contact sensitization which is frequently associated with atopic dermatitis.

SIAscopy cannot replace the standard of care in skin cancer diagnosis, which includes clinical and dermoscopic examination. However, considering that the technique does not require specific training and expertise, it might represent an additional, relatively cost-effective tool to select lesions for referral.

Among patients routinely undergoing patch testing for suspected allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), nickel is the most frequently sensitizing hapten, with a clear predominance in the female population. However, some patients who report the appearance of dermatitis upon exposure to metal objects show negative patch test results to a nickel sulfate 5% pet. application. In some cases, a positive response to nickel can be observed simply by repeating the patch test. The objective of our study was to assess if, during routine patch testing, positive responses to nickel sulfate are missed owing to contingent problems, referring to application site, patch test execution or variations in skin reactivity. To this end, we applied 2 different patch test materials containing nickel sulfate 5% pet. to 3040 consecutive patients, undergoing patch testing for suspected allergic contact dermatitis, during the same session. The rôle of the test site was also investigated by applying the preparation on 2 different sites of the back in 30 patients. Of the whole, 612 patients (20%) showed positive patch test responses. The 2 nickel materials were almost equivalent: 78% of nickel-sensitive patients had positive reactions to both, whereas 11% showed a positive response to 1 preparation alone. No variations in patch test responses in relation to application site were observed. Our data show that false-negative patch test responses to nickel are frequent. The use of 2 different preparations during the same patch test session increases the response rate by 10%.