Local ischemic postconditioning (IPost) and remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPer) are promising methods to decrease ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. We tested whether the use of the two procedures in combination led to an improvement in cardioprotection through a higher activation of survival signaling pathways. Rats exposed to myocardial I/R were allocated to one of the following four groups: Control, no intervention at myocardial reperfusion; IPost, three cycles of 10-s coronary artery occlusion followed by 10-s reperfusion applied at the onset of myocardial reperfusion; RIPer, 10-min limb ischemia followed by 10-min reperfusion initiated 20 min after coronary artery occlusion; IPost+RIPer, IPost and RIPer in combination. Infarct size was significantly reduced in both IPost and RIPer (34.25 ± 3.36 and 24.69 ± 6.02%, respectively) groups compared to Control (54.93 ± 6.46%, both p < 0.05). IPost+RIPer (infarct size = 18.04 ± 4.86%) was significantly more cardioprotective than IPost alone (p < 0.05). RISK pathway (Akt, ERK1/2, and GSK-3β) activation was enhanced in IPost, RIPer, and IPost+RIPer groups compared to Control. IPost+RIPer did not enhance RISK pathway activation as compared to IPost alone, but instead increased phospho-STAT-3 levels, highlighting the crucial role of the SAFE pathway. In IPost+RIPer, a SAFE inhibitor (AG490) abolished cardioprotection and blocked both Akt and GSK-3β phosphorylations, whereas RISK inhibitors (wortmannin or U0126) abolished cardioprotection and blocked STAT-3 phosphorylation. In our experimental model, the combination of IPost and RIPer improved cardioprotection through the recruitment of the SAFE pathway. Our findings also indicate that cross talk exists between the RISK and SAFE pathways.

No abstract

Remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPer) and local ischemic postconditioning (IPost) are promising methods to decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury. We tested whether these two methods were effective in reducing infarct size through activation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response, a potential survival pathway. Rats exposed to myocardial ischemia-reperfusion were allocated to one of six groups: control, no intervention at myocardial reperfusion; IPost, three cycles of 10-s coronary artery occlusion followed by 10-s reperfusion applied at the onset of myocardial reperfusion; RIPer, 10-min limb ischemia followed by 10-min reperfusion initiated during coronary artery occlusion; control + 4-PBA, injection of ER stress inhibitor 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PBA) 1 h before coronary occlusion; IPost + 4-PBA; and RIPer + 4-PBA. Infarct size was significantly reduced in IPost and RIPer groups (33.32% ± 3.65% and 21.86% ± 3.98%, respectively) compared with the control group (54.86% ± 6.01%, P < 0.05). Western blot analysis of GRP78 (glucose-regulated protein) level and cleaved activating transcription factor 6, two ER stress markers, demonstrated an enhancement of ER stress response in IPost group but not in RIPer group at 15-min reperfusion. Furthermore, 4-PBA abolished cardioprotection induced by IPost (infarct size 53.75 ± 3.49 vs. 33.32 ± 3.65%, P < 0.05) but not by RIPer (28.80 ± 10.45% vs. 21.86 ± 3.98%, not statistically significant). GRP78 and cleaved activating transcription factor 6 levels were no longer increased in IPost group after 4-PBA. These findings point to a role for ER stress response in cardioprotection against reperfusion injury in IPost but not RIPer, suggesting differences in cardioprotective mechanisms between local and remote conditioning.

Electrical stimulation of calf muscle with the Veinoplus device results in a significant increase of arterial inflow without measurable muscle ischemia or pain. Potential use of this device as an adjuvant treatment to improve walking capacity in PAD patients remains to be evaluated.