Shallot is a national strategic commodity in Indonesia, but it is development has a fundamental technical, socioeconomic, and policy support problems. Therefore, it is essential to know the competitiveness of shallot in Indonesia and the incentive policy to implement the comparative advantage to become a sustainable competitive advantage. The purposes of this study are to (1) analyze the profitability of shallot farming privately and socially, (2) analyze the competitiveness of shallot farming from a competitive and comparative advantage perspective, (3) review the impact of government policy on shallot farming, and (4) formulate incentive policies in the development of shallot commodities. The empirical results of the Policy Analysis Matrix revealed that shallot farming in production centers in Indonesia has both competitive and comparative advantages. The highest competitive and comparative advantages were found in the dry season in the upland of Malang district with the coefficient values of PCR (Private Cost Ratio) of 0.268–0.508 and DRCR (Domestic Resource Cost Ratio) of 0.208–0.323. The lowest competitive advantage was found in the lowland of East Lombok district in the dry season with a coefficient value of PCR 0.728–0.844. The lowest comparative advantage in the dry season was found in East Lombok district with a DRCR of 0.448, while in the rainy season, it was found in Wonosobo district with a DRCR of 0.522. These results mean that it is more profitable for Indonesia to increase domestic shallot production than to import. Improving shallot competitiveness can be carried out by implementing advanced technology, agricultural infrastructure, capacity building of farmers’ resources, and government incentive policies to increase productivity and competitiveness sustainability.
Fertilizer is one of the important inputs in crop productivity; thus, its existence and utilization are considered crucial. One of the policies in the fertilizer provision is subsidy. It has long been applied with some policies such as fertilizer provision, distribution, and control. Fertilizer subsidy policy is not optimally implemented and necessary improvement is needed, such as: (i) fertilizer allocated for farmers is expanded from one year to two years, (ii) the last point of distribution is the farmers group (line V), (iii) determination of retail kiosk in accordance with the rules, and (iv) allocation of sufficient funds as well as establishment of permanent officers for PPNS (Civil Servant Investigator) and KP3 (Commission on Fertilizer Distribution Supervisor).
Synthetic pesticides are widely applied for pest and disease control in Indonesia. However, a lack of knowledge and use of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for safe pesticide usage among Indonesian farmers remains a problem. This study aims to investigate the gap between farmers' knowledge of GAP for safe pesticide usage and their application of it. This research was conducted in 2020 in five Indonesian provinces. Primary data collection was by means of a survey, in which 298 respondents answered structured questionnaires. The survey also identified the sources of the information recorded and the respondents' experience of pesticide exposure. The analysis tools used were the Wilcoxon Signed Ranked Test and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). There were significant differences in the results of the first analysis. These results appear to confirm the results of further analysis using IPA, which show that a high level of knowledge does not mean that farmers will apply this knowledge in practice: this is particularly relevant to wearing gloves and masks, using tools to remove blockages, never clearing blocked nozzles by blowing into them, and disposing of empty containers properly. Nevertheless, in some cases high levels of knowledge do result in high levels of application. Cases of pesticide exposure affecting human health by causing symptoms such as dizziness, nausea, and vomiting confirm that GAP for pesticide usage are not being implemented properly by some farmers. It is therefore recommended that their knowledge should be enhanced through the series of technical training programs using participatory approaches, so that farmers accumulate knowledge which will drive them to adopt GAP for safe pesticide usage.
Program pemberdayaan masyarakat yang bertujuan untuk mengentaskan kemiskinan di pedesaan pada prinsipnya memiliki banyak persamaan. Hal ini terlihat pada program PUAP dan Demapan. Adapun persamaannya antara lain : sama-sama berbasis desa, dilaksanakan oleh kelompok masyarakat, mendapatkan modal usaha pertanian dan non pertanian, terbentuknya lembaga keuangan mikro ditingkat desa, dan dibimbing oleh penyuluh dan tenaga pendamping. Dalam pelaksanaannya program tersebut masih banyak mengalami permasalahan dan untuk mengatasinya diperlukan koordinasi dengan cara mensinergikan program PUAP dengan Demapan. Sinergi dan integritasi kedua program mencakup beberapa aspek, yaitu : (1) diawali dengan sinergi data, pemilihan desa penerima program; (2) penataan internal kelembagaan program; (3) pemantapan pengembangan infrastruktur dengan sasaran akselerasi pengentasan kemiskinan; dan (4) antisipasi implementasi sinergi kedua program di lapangan. Dengan mengoptimalkan empat aspek tersebut, diharapkan akselerasi pembangunan pertanian dan ekonomi desa yang mengarah pada pengentasan kemiskinan dapat diwujudkan.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.