A gentle start of dialysis is a welcome possibility for both patients and physicians. Incident dialysis patients often maintain residual kidney function (RKF) for a considerable period of time; the start of dialysis is often driven mainly by uremic symptoms. Recently, the combination of a low-protein diet, along with a less-frequent dialysis schedule, has regained interest as an alternative option in selected and motivated patients. In addition, there is renewed interest in a low-protein diet in patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Dietary regimens have additional objectives now: obtaining better control of phosphate and potassium levels; preventing or reducing metabolic acidosis, protein catabolism, and malnutrition; and reducing uremic symptoms. In the eighties and early nineties, data from uncontrolled studies showed that combining a very low-protein diet with once weekly hemodialysis was a feasible approach. However, these diets were very demanding with poor patient compliance and had a high risk of smoldering malnutrition. However, recent experience has shown that the new protein-free foods have better palatability and nutritional properties; this has increased adherence to dietary prescriptions. Dietary regimens are now tailored to the patient's needs and habits. A multidisciplinary approach is considered crucial for updating medical needs and dietary prescriptions, ensuring adherence to the combined program, and avoiding the development of malnutrition and inadequate dialysis. Monitoring RKF is another key factor for the success of the program due to the importance of optimal timing of the transition to twice-weekly regimens and, eventually, thrice-weekly hemodialysis.
Background and Aims A growing number of patients treated with maintenance dialysis are older, frail and have functional impairment. In many instances, functional impairment is a more powerful predictor of adverse outcomes than traditional disease-based measures. The Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item short form survey (KDQOL-36) is widely used in dialysis patients; its scores are important predictor of outcome. Aim of the study is to evaluate the associations of KDQOL-36 scores with diabetes, dialysis modality, nutritional status and age in a cohort of dialysis patients from Chile. Method observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study performed in the region of Valparaiso, Chile. 207 adult patients on dialysis from more than 3 months (140 in HD, 67 in PD: mean age 58.9 ± 14.5 years with 37% >= 65 years, M/F 119/88) were asked to fill in the Spanish translation of the KDQOL-36 questionnaire (administered by a trained caregiver). The responses to the SF-36 questions were used to determine scores for the mental component summary (MCS), physical component summary (PCS), burden of kidney disease (BKD), symptoms and problems of kidney disease (SPKD), effects of kidney disease (EKD). The scores went from 0 to 100; the higher scores the better the quality of life. 50 was set as a cut-off level. Nutritional parameters were collected (BMI; mean 27.16 ± 4.7 kg/m2, brachial muscular or fat areas (< 25th percentile for age and sex defined as malnourished). All the patients signed an informed consent. Results Overall, mean scores and percentage of patients with values <50 on the PCS, MCS, BKD, SPKD, and EKD subscales were 45.54 ± 18.82 (60.9%), 57.38 ± 19.41 (36.2%), 73.43 ±18.33 (65.2%), 79.03 ±11.59 (1.9%), and 36.02 ± 34.74 (11.6%), respectively. The mean score of the combination of MCS and PCS was 51.46 ± 16.77 (52.2%). Compared to younger patients, those who were 65 or more years old had significantly higher score of EKD (79.91 ± 16.63 vs 69.59 ± 18.26, p<0.0001), with only 12% of older patients having a score below 50 (Χ2 7.79, p=0.005); the other subscales did not differ significantly. Ninety-one (43.5%) patients were diabetics. They were more likely of being older, having a higher BMI and lower signs of malnutrition (borderline significance). In comparison to non-diabetics, they had lower mean scores on BKD scale (30.42 ± 35.12 vs 40.4 ± 33.87, p=0.04) with a higher number having BKD scores < 50 (66/91 vs 69/116, Χ2 3.82, p=0.035). Moreover, they were more likely of having scores < 50 for the SPKD and EKD subscales. A significant reduction of the muscular and fat brachial areas (<25th percentile) were found in 88 (42.1%) and 49 (23.4%) of the patients, respectively. Mean scores of all subscales did not differ significantly between the groups of muscular and fat brachial areas. The dialysis modality had a significant impact on some subscales. in comparison to PD, a higher number of HD patients had scores < 50 for BKD (Χ2 18.24, p < 0.0001). On the other hand, PD patients were more likely of having lower MNS scores (Χ2 5.69, p < 0.013) and of the combination of PCS and MCS subscales (Χ2 12.82, p < 0.0001). Similar findings were obtained when analysing the scores as continuous variables. Conclusion This is the first formal evaluation of the performances of the KDQOL-36 questionnaire in a cohort of dialysis patients in Chile. Overall, the mean scores of PCS and EKD were well below the reference value of 50. General and kidney-related subscales were affected differently by age, dialysis modality and diabetes. In particular diabetic patients were more likely to perform poorly at kidney-related subscales, with no significant difference for general ones. Interestingly, dialysis modality had an impact on both BKD and MCS with opposite trends. The nutritional status seems to little affect patient quality of life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.