CIMP is independently associated with significantly worse prognosis in CRC patients. However, CIMP's value as a predictive factor in assessing whether adjuvant 5-FU therapy will confer additional survival benefit to CRC patients remained to be determined through future prospective randomized studies.
The V45 may predict risk of developing hypothyroidism after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, and a V45 of 50% can be a useful dose-volumetric threshold of radiation-induced hypothyroidism.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate objective cosmetic outcomes and factors related to breast-conserving therapy (BCT) using the BCCT.core software.Materials and MethodsFifty-one patients who received BCT with informed consent were evaluated using the BCCT.core software. Patients were divided into two groups based on the BCCT score: excellent or good (n=42) vs. fair or poor (n=9). Analysis of clinical factors was performed to determine factors affecting cosmetic outcomes.ResultsThe objective cosmetic outcome of BCT measured using the BCCT.core software was excellent in 10% of patients, good in 72%, and fair in 18%. None of the patients were classified as poor outcome. Tumor characteristics, systemic adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy), and radiation dose or energy of electron boost did not show correlation with the score measured by the BCCT.core program (p > 0.05). In univariate analysis, maximum dose within the breast (Dmax), width of tangential field, and excised tumor volume were smaller in patients with excellent or good by the BCCT.core compared to those with fair or poor (Dmax, 110.2±1.5% vs. 111.6±1.7%, p=0.019; width of tangential field, 8.0±1.1 cm vs. 8.6±0.7 cm, p=0.034; excised tumor volume, 64.0±35.8 cm3 vs. 95.3±54.4 cm3, p=0.067). In multivariate analysis, only Dmax was a significant factor for breast cosmetic outcome with a risk ratio of 1.697 (95% confidence interval, 1.006 to 2.863; p=0.047).ConclusionObjective measurement of cosmetic outcome of BCT using the BCCT.core software was feasible. The cosmetic outcome of BCT may be affected by the maximum dose within the breast.
Thirteen patients with early glottic cancer were enrolled for a phase 1 dose escalation trial of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy. Doselimiting toxicities, specifically grade 3 late toxicities, occurred in 2 of 6 patients who received 55 Gy in 11 fractions. Hypofractionated radiation therapy at doses of 59.5 Gy in 17 fractions was well tolerated with acceptable voice outcomes, quality of life, and local control. Purpose: The early results of a phase 1 study of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for early-stage glottis cancer were previously reported. However, additional late adverse events occurred in the second arm during the follow-up period. In this study, the dose-limiting toxicities and premature closure of the clinical trial are reported. Methods and Materials: Thirteen patients with cT1-2N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis were enrolled between May 2015 and July 2018. Seven patients in the first arm received 59.5 Gy to the gross tumor volume and 47.6 Gy to the remaining larynx, delivered in 17 fractions. The second arm dose was 55 Gy and 40.7 Gy in 11 fractions to the gross tumor volume and the remaining larynx, respectively. Patients were treated according to the simultaneous integrated boost approach with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Results: The median follow-up was 37 months (range, 6-41.4) for the first arm and 14.5 months (range, 4.8-21.5) for the second arm. Maximum acute toxicity was grade 2 laryngeal mucositis for each arm. Maximum chronic toxicity was grade 3 laryngeal inflammation, occurring in 2 patients (33.3%) in the second arm. One patient underwent a laryngomicrosurgical biopsy for a vocal cord ulcer, and another patient underwent supraglottic laryngectomy because of arytenoid cartilage necrosis. In the first
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.