No abstract

Background: The emergence of the coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) resulted in a global pandemic. The psychological impact of an epidemic is multifaceted and acute, with long-term consequences. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey-based design was employed, assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on members of the Irish public during the quarantine period of COVID-19 in Ireland. Participants were invited to complete the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) retrospectively (prior to quarantine) and during the quarantine period, as well as measures of illness perceptions, well-being, and a bespoke measure (the Effects of COVID Questionnaire, ECQ), which assessed perceptions of COVID-related stresses associated with personal concerns, caring for children, caring for aging parents, as well as gratitude. Results: A total of n = 1620 entered the survey platform, with a total of n = 847 surveys completed by members of the Irish public. Entry into COVID-19 quarantine was associated with significant increases in clinically significant symptoms of depression, stress, and anxiety. The ECQ reliably assessed a range of COVID-19-related stresses and had large and significant correlations with the DASS-21. Conclusions: The COVID-19 quarantine was associated with stresses and significant increases in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in a national Irish cohort. The public require increased access to mental health services to meet this increase in COVID-19-related psychological distress.

Our analysis builds on previous knowledge of ALSFRS-R subscores. Decline in ALSFRS-R motor subscores in patients with spinal-onset disease, and decline in ALSFRS-R bulbar subscores in patients with bulbar-onset disease, may predate reported disease onset dates. Respiratory subscores were not prognostically informative after adjustment for bulbar and motor subscores. These results provide robust evidence that the ALSFRS-R should not be reported as a single combined score, but rather as domain specific subscores.

The objective of the study was to investigate whether cognitive and behavioural impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) contributes to caregiver burden, and whether carer burden affects patient outcome. Thirty-three dyads of incident patients with ALS and their primary caregivers (n = 33) completed a series of measures to determine cognitive and behavioural profiles, (patients) and carer burden (carers) to investigate the psychological impact of ALS, and the impact of behavioural change since the onset of ALS. Caregivers were divided into high- and low-burden groups using previously established norms. High burden in carers was associated with significantly higher apathy (p = 0.009), disinhibition (p = 0.005), and executive dysfunction (p = 0.015) in patients. Regression analyses for burden confirmed significant predictors such as change in apathy (r = 0.390, F = 5.19, p = 0.03), disinhibition (r = 0.530, F = 11.32, p = 0.002), and executive dysfunction (r = 0.372, F = 4.66, p = 0.039), with total behaviour change contributing to 31 % of caregiver burden (r = 0.563, F = 4.17, p = 0.015). Total distress as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was also a significant predictor of caregiver burden, contributing to 38.5 % of variance (r = 0.621, F = 18.79, p < 0.000). Caregiver burden did not affect survival (p = 0.496). Caregiver burden in ALS is modulated by patient's cognitive and behavioural status, but does not significantly impact patient survival.