This study compares the timeliness of radiology interpretation of Emergency Department (ED) imaging examinations in a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) before and after implementation of an automated paging system for notification of image availability. An alphanumeric pager for each radiology subspecialty (chest, pediatrics, bone, neuroradiology, and body) was used to alert the responsible radiologist that an ED imaging examination is available to be viewed on the PACS. The paging system was programmed to trigger off of the PACS database when an image is received on the appropriate radiology display station. The pager message includes the radiology accession number and examination description (such as chest, two-view, or c-spine, etc). The PACS paging tool performance was assessed by calculating the time elapsed, for each ED imaging examination, from the Time Imaged to the Time of Interpretation, where the Time Imaged is the actual image completion time measured at the imaging modality, and the Time Interpreted is the time a radiology interpretation is rendered to the ED, and is measured from the Radiology-to-ED fax time stamp. These measures were analyzed pre- and post-paging system implementation to determine any impact of the automated notification tool on radiology service turnaround time. Results show an improved radiology response time from image completion to interpretation rendered to ED clinicians, down from hour(s) to minutes, with the automated paging examination notification system. Examinations are read by the appropriate radiology specialty section in a more timely fashion, and fewer cases go unread by radiology.
This report describes the authors' experience in the design and implementation of two large scale picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) during the past 10 years. The first system, which is in daily clinical operation was developed at University of California, Los Angeles from 1983 to 1992. The second system, which continues evolving, has been in development at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) since 1992. The report highiights the differences between the two systems and points out the gradual change in the PACS design concept during the past 10 years from a closed architecture to an open hospitalintegrated system. Both systems focus on system reliability and data integrity, with 24-hour on-line service and no Ioss of images. The major difference between the two systems is that the UCSF PACS infrastructure design is a completely open architecture and the system implementation uses more advanced technologies in computer software, digital communication, system interface, and stable industry standards. Such a PACS can withstand future technology changes without rendering the system obsolete, an essential criterion in any PACS design.
Department of Radiology currently has a clinically operational picture archiving and communication system (PACS) that is thirty-five percent filmless, with the goal of becoming seventy-five percent filmless within the year. The design and implementation of the clinical PACS has been a collaborative effort between an academic research laboratory and a commercial vendor partner. Images are digitally acquired from three computed radiography (CR) scanners, five computed tomography (CT) scanners, five magnetic resonance (MR) imagers, three digital fluoroscopic rooms, an ultrasound mini-PACS and a nuclear medicine mini-PACS. The DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) standard communications protocol and image format is adhered to throughout the PACS. Images are archived in hierarchical staged fashion, on a RAID (redundant array of inexpensive disks) and on magneto-optical disk jukeboxes. The clinical PACS uses an object-oriented Oracle Sal (systems query language) database, and interfaces to the Radiology Information System using the Hl7 (Health languages 7) standard. Components are networked using a combination of switched and fast ethernet, and ATM (asynchronous transfer mode), all over fiber optics. The wide area network links six UCSF sites in San Francisco. A combination of high and medium resolution dual-monitor display stations have been placed throughout the Department of Radiology, the Emergency Department (ED) and Intensive Care Units (ICU). A continuing quality improvement (Cal) committee has been formed to facilitate the PACS installation and training, workflow modifications, quality assurance and clinical acceptance. This committee includes radiologists at all levels (resident, fellow. attending), radiology technologists, film library personnel, ED and ICU clinician end-users, and PACS team members. The cal committee has proved vital in the creation of new management procedures, providing a means for user feedback and education, and contributing to the overall acceptance of. and user satisfaction with the system. Well developed cal procedures have been essential to the successful clinical operation of the PACS as UCSFRadiology moves toward a filmless department.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.