BackgroundMetastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor 5-year-survival rate (<15%). A surgical approach is recommended in selected patients if complete resection of distant metastasis can be achieved. To date there are only limited data on the outcome after surgical resection of hepatic metastases of ACC.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the German Adrenocortical Carcinoma Registry was conducted. Patients with liver metastases of ACC but without extrahepatic metastases or incomplete tumour resection were included.ResultsSeventy-seven patients fulfilled these criteria. Forty-three patients underwent resection of liver metastases of ACC. Complete tumour resection (R0) could be achieved in 30 (69.8%). Median overall survival after liver resection was 76.1 months in comparison to 10.1 months in the 34 remaining patients with unresected liver metastases (p < 0.001). However, disease free survival after liver resection was only 9.1 months. Neither resection status (R0/R1) nor extent of liver resection were significant predictive factors for overall survival. Patients with a time interval to the first metastasis/recurrence (TTFR) of greater than 12 months or solitary liver metastases showed significantly prolonged survival.ConclusionsLiver resection in the case of ACC liver metastases can achieve long term survival with a median overall survival of more than 5 years, but disease free survival is short despite metastasectomy. Time to recurrence and single versus multiple metastases are predictive factors for the outcome.

BackgroundThe treatment of oral cancer remains challenging due to its infiltrative nature and a high tendency for tumour relapse leading to an overall poor prognosis. In the case of early recurrence, the patient’s prognosis deteriorates dramatically, with survival rate dropping to below 30%. Minimal improvements in survival trends in recurrent and advanced stage tumours have been reported in recent decades. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy may represent a new therapeutic approach changing the standard of care in advanced oral cancer therapy.Case PresentationWe describe the case of a woman in her late 30’s who presented in mid-2019 with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) localized to the floor of the mouth. After initial R0 resection, selective neck dissection, and adjuvant brachytherapy, an early recurrence of OSCC located between the hyoid bone and the mandible was diagnosed at the end of 2019. An off-label treatment regimen was performed with neoadjuvant use of Pembrolizumab 19 days prior to salvage surgery. Radiological and histological assessment of T-cell and programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was performed before and after checkpoint inhibitor application. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy resulted in increased T-cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression, as well as a significant tumour necrosis rate. One cycle of Pembrolizumab led to significant regressive tumour changes with increases in immune infiltration, sclerosis, and necrosis of 75% of the tumour mass with only 25% vital tumour cells remaining. By June 2020, the patient remained without recurrence.ConclusionsThe case presented outlines the potential effects of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in recurrent or advanced OSCC prior to definitive surgical tumour treatment. The benefit of additional adjuvant treatment after histologic response will be discussed. The case is also analysed considering ongoing clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for head and neck malignancies.

BackgroundPrognosis of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer is generally poor. Adjuvant immunotherapy (IT) featuring immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is standard of care in advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). ICI response rates in CSCC are described as higher than in HNSCC. IT is constantly shifting into earlier disease stages which confronts the surgeon with immunotherapeutically pre-treated patients. It is therefore becoming increasingly difficult to assess which patients with symptomatic tumor disease and a lack of curative surgical option might benefit from salvage surgery.Case presentationsThe following 6 cases describe therapeutic decision-making regarding ICI and (salvage) surgery in patients with advanced stage HNSCC or CSCC. Cases A and B focus on neoadjuvant ICI followed by salvage surgery. In Cases C and D salvage surgery was performed after short-term stabilization with partial response to ICI. The last two cases (Cases E and F) address the surgical approach after failure of ICI. All cases are discussed in the context of the current study landscape and with focus on individual decision-making. For better understanding, a timetable of the clinical course is given for each case.ConclusionsICI is rapidly expanding its frontiers into the neoadjuvant setting, frequently confronting the surgeon with heavily pretreated patients. Salvage surgery is a viable therapeutic concept despite the rise of systemic treatment options. Decision-making on surgical intervention in case of a salvage surgery remains an individual choice. For neoadjuvant ICI monitoring regarding pathological tumor response or tumor necrosis rate, we suggest correlation between the initial biopsy and the definite tumor resectate in order to increase its significance as a surrogate marker. Scheduling of neoadjuvant ICI should be further investigated, as recent studies indicate better outcomes with shorter time frames.