These findings are perhaps the first to explain why many patients have symptoms and injury associated with nonacidic reflux, and could have important implications for the development of new therapies for reflux, such as pepsin receptor antagonists and/or irreversible inhibitors of peptic activity.
Objective/Hypothesis
Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is thought to be a significant risk factor for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), but causality has never been proven. It is accepted that chronic reflux into the esophagus can induce metaplastic changes in esophageal mucosa with subsequent increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, but no similar associations have been established for LPR and laryngopharyngeal SCC. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that reflux of pepsin into the laryngopharynx can promote carcinogenesis.
Study Design
Translational research study
Methods
Normal human laryngeal primary epithelial cell cultures and hypopharyngeal FaDu SCC cells were exposed to human pepsin and analyzed by Human Cancer PathwayFinder and miRNA Superarrays, flow cytometry and Western blot to determine the effect of pepsin on carcinogenesis. Laryngeal biopsy specimens, taken from cancer patients and normal control subjects, were analyzed for the presence of pepsin by Western blot.
Results
Microarray analysis demonstrated that pepsin significantly altered the expression of 27 genes implicated in carcinogenesis and also affected the expression of 22 microRNAs known to be altered in human head and neck cancers. Pepsin increased proliferation in both FaDu SCC cells and cultured normal laryngeal epithelial primary cells by increasing S phase distribution on flow cytometry analysis in a time and dose dependent manner. Furthermore, pepsin was detected in 60% (3/5) human laryngeal cancer biopsies, absent in all (0/5) normal control specimens.
Conclusion
These data support a role for refluxed pepsin in the promotion of epithelial proliferation and carcinogenesis of the larynx and pharynx.
Diagnosis of extraesophageal reflux (EER) currently relies on tools designed for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Such tools lack the sensitivity and reproducibility to detect the less frequent and mildly acidic reflux associated with upper airway disease. Pepsin has been posited to be a reliable biological marker of EER. Our aim was to present a comprehensive literature review of the use of pepsin as a diagnostic marker of EER. Two methods are typically used for detection of pepsin in the airways: enzymatic and immunologic. The limitations, advantages, and examples of use of each are discussed. Pepsin assay has been used to identify refluxate in trachea, lung, sinus, middle ear, combined sputum and saliva, and breath condensate. An immunologic pepsin assay of combined sputum and saliva was determined to be 100% sensitive and 89% specific for detection of EER (based on pH-metry), and an enzymatic test of nasal lavage fluid (100% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity) demonstrated an increased incidence of EER in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Pepsin assay identified tracheal pepsin to be an indicator of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and related mortality risk in ventilated preterm infants. Pepsin assay is a useful tool for correlation of reflux with airway disease and is a reliable diagnostic marker of EER.
Exposure of hypopharyngeal cells to pepsin in a nonacidic environment induces the expression of several pro-inflammatory cytokines and receptors, including those known to be involved in inflammation of esophageal epithelium in response to reflux and which contribute to the pathophysiology of reflux esophagitis. These data indicate that refluxed pepsin may contribute to laryngeal inflammation associated with nonacidic gastric reflux, including that experienced by patients despite maximal acid suppression therapy.
Pepsin, at pH 7, in nonacidic refluxate, causes damage by becoming reactivated inside the cell. Irreversible inhibitors of peptic activity hold promise as a new therapy for reflux.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.