Context Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of endocrine hypertension (HT). HT remission (defined as blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg without antihypertensive drugs) has been reported in approximately 50% of patients with unilateral PA after adrenalectomy. HT duration and severity are predictors of blood pressure response, but the prognostic role of somatic KCNJ5 mutations is unclear. Objective To determine clinical and molecular features associated with HT remission after adrenalectomy in patients with unilateral PA. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 100 patients with PA (60 women; median age at diagnosis 48 years with a median follow-up of 26 months). Anatomopathological analysis revealed 90 aldosterone-producing adenomas, 1 carcinoma, and 9 unilateral adrenal hyperplasias. All patients had biochemical cure after unilateral adrenalectomy. KCNJ5 gene was sequenced in 76 cases. Results KCNJ5 mutations were identified in 33 of 76 (43.4%) tumors: p.Gly151Arg (n = 17), p.Leu168Arg (n = 15), and p.Glu145Gln (n = 1). HT remission was reported in 37 of 100 (37%) patients. Among patients with HT remission, 73% were women (P = 0.04), 48.6% used more than three antihypertensive medications (P = 0.0001), and 64.9% had HT duration <10 years (P = 0.0015) compared with those without HT remission. Somatic KCNJ5 mutations were associated with female sex (P = 0.004), larger nodules (P = 0.001), and HT remission (P = 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, only a somatic KCNJ5 mutation was an independent predictor of HT remission after adrenalectomy (P = 0.004). Conclusion The presence of a KCNJ5 somatic mutation is an independent predictor of HT remission after unilateral adrenalectomy in patients with unilateral PA.
Context Primary aldosteronism (PA) screening relies on an elevated aldosterone to renin ratio with a minimum aldosterone level, which varies from 10 to 15 ng/dL (277 to 415.5 pmol/L) using immunoassay. Aim To evaluate intraindividual coefficient of variation (CV) of aldosterone and aldosterone to direct renin concentration ratio (A/DRC) and its impact on PA screening. Methods A total of 671 aldosterone and DRC measurements were performed by the same chemiluminescence assays in a large cohort of 216 patients with confirmed PA and at least two screenings. Results The median intraindividual CV of aldosterone and A/DRC was 26.8% and 26.7%. Almost 40% of the patients had at least one aldosterone level <15 ng/dL, 19.9% had at least two aldosterone levels <15 ng/dL and 16.2% had mean aldosterone levels <15 ng/dL. A lower cut-off of 10 ng/dL was associated with false negative rates for PA screening of 14.3% for a single aldosterone measurement, 4.6% for two aldosterone measurements and only 2.3% for mean aldosterone levels. Considering the minimum aldosterone, true positive rate of aldosterone thresholds was 85.7% for 10 ng/dL and 61.6% for 15 ng/dL. An A/DRC >2 ng/dL/µIU/mL had a true positive rate for PA diagnosis of 94.4% and 98.4% when based on one or two assessments, respectively. CV of aldosterone and A/DRC were not affected by sex, use of interfering anti-hypertensive medications, PA lateralization, hypokalemia, age and number of hormone measurements. Conclusion Aldosterone concentrations had a high CV in PA patients, which results in an elevated rate of false negative test in a single screening for PA. Therefore, PA screening should be based in at least two screenings with concomitant aldosterone and renin measurements.
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of endocrine hypertension. PA subtypes include bilateral hyperplasia and unilateral PA, typically aldosterone-producing adenomas. Adrenal venous (AV) sampling (AVS) is a key step to define PA subtype and guide PA management. According current PA guidelines, most PA patients should undergo AVS, which is a challenging procedure, especially in terms of successfully cannulating the right AV. The aim of this study was to report a single tertiary center experience with AVS in PA patients. We retrospectively evaluated 84 AVS from 1984 to 2019. Sequential AVS was performed by an experienced interventional radiologist. AV and inferior vena cava (IVC) samples were obtained under cosyntropin continuous infusion. Successful catheterization was defined by a selectivity index [SI= AV/IVC cortisol (C) concentrations] ≥5. Unilateral disease was defined by a lateralization index [LI= aldosterone (A)/C ratio in the dominant AV divided by A/C in the non-dominant AV] ≥4. The relative aldosterone secretion index (RASI= A/C ratio in AV divided by A/C in IVC) was calculated in each side. A RASI <1 was defined as contralateral suppression (CS). In patients with unsuccessful AV catheterization (mostly right AV) or undetermined LI (3-4), CS was used to indicate adrenalectomy. The biochemical cure of PA after adrenalectomy was defined as the gold standard parameter to confirm unilateral disease. Successful bilateral AV catheterization was achieved in 75% of the cases. After 2015, the use of intra-procedural rapid cortisol assay improved angiographer experience and increased AVS successful rate from 52 to 80%. LI revealed unilateral and bilateral aldosterone excess in 68 and 32% of the cases, respectively. A LI ≥4 had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98% to define unilateral PA among patients with successful catheterization. In addition, RASI in the non-dominant AV was significantly lower in unilateral PA according the LI when compared to bilateral cases [0.12 (0.03 to 1.18) vs. 1.1 (0.04 to 4.56), p= 0.0001]. RASI in the non-dominant AV was inversely correlated with LI (r= -0.81, p= 0.0001). A CS index ≤0.5 had a high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (94%) to define unilateral aldosterone excess. In conclusion, the LI is the most valuable parameter in AVS for PA subtyping. Additionally, CS (cut-off of 0.5) is very useful to define lateralization and can be used in cases of borderline LI or unsuccessful AV catheterization.CAPES Grant to Freitas TC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.