One of the major barriers to the use of enzymes in industrial biotechnology is their insufficient stability under processing conditions. The use of organic solvent systems instead of aqueous media for enzymatic reactions offers numerous advantages, such as increased solubility of hydrophobic substrates or suppression of water-dependent side reactions. For example, reverse hydrolysis reactions that form esters from acids and alcohols become thermodynamically favorable. However, organic solvents often inactivate enzymes. Industry and academia have devoted considerable effort into developing effective strategies to enhance the lifetime of enzymes in the presence of organic solvents. The strategies can be grouped into three main categories: (i) isolation of novel enzymes functioning under extreme conditions, (ii) modification of enzyme structures to increase their resistance toward nonconventional media, and (iii) modification of the solvent environment to decrease its denaturing effect on enzymes. Here we discuss successful examples representing each of these categories and summarize their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we highlight some potential future research directions in the field, such as investigation of novel nanomaterials for immobilization, wider application of computational tools for semirational prediction of stabilizing mutations, knowledge-driven modification of key structural elements learned from successfully engineered proteins, and replacement of volatile organic solvents by ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents.

An enzyme's substrate specificity is one of its most important characteristics. The quantitative comparison of broad-specificity enzymes requires the selection of a homogenous set of substrates for experimental testing, determination of substrate-specificity data and analysis using multivariate statistics. We describe a systematic analysis of the substrate specificities of nine wild-type and four engineered haloalkane dehalogenases. The enzymes were characterized experimentally using a set of 30 substrates selected using statistical experimental design from a set of nearly 200 halogenated compounds. Analysis of the activity data showed that the most universally useful substrates in the assessment of haloalkane dehalogenase activity are 1-bromobutane, 1-iodopropane, 1-iodobutane, 1,2-dibromoethane and 4-bromobutanenitrile. Functional relationships among the enzymes were explored using principal component analysis. Analysis of the untransformed specific activity data revealed that the overall activity of wild-type haloalkane dehalogenases decreases in the following order: LinB~DbjA>DhlA~DhaA~DbeA~DmbA>DatA~DmbC~DrbA. After transforming the data, we were able to classify haloalkane dehalogenases into four SSGs (substrate-specificity groups). These functional groups are clearly distinct from the evolutionary subfamilies, suggesting that phylogenetic analysis cannot be used to predict the substrate specificity of individual haloalkane dehalogenases. Structural and functional comparisons of wild-type and mutant enzymes revealed that the architecture of the active site and the main access tunnel significantly influences the substrate specificity of these enzymes, but is not its only determinant. The identification of other structural determinants of the substrate specificity remains a challenge for further research on haloalkane dehalogenases.

Haloalkane dehalogenases (EC 3.8.1.5, HLDs) are α/β-hydrolases which act to cleave carbon-halogen bonds. Due to their unique catalytic mechanism, broad substrate specificity and high robustness, the members of this enzyme family have been employed in several practical applications: (i) biocatalytic preparation of optically pure building-blocks for organic synthesis; (ii) recycling of by-products from chemical processes; (iii) bioremediation of toxic environmental pollutants; (iv) decontamination of warfare agents; (v) biosensing of environmental pollutants; and (vi) protein tagging for cell imaging and protein analysis. This review discusses the application of HLDs in the context of the biochemical properties of individual enzymes. Further extension of HLD uses within the field of biotechnology will require currently limiting factors - such as low expression, product inhibition, insufficient enzyme selectivity, low affinity and catalytic efficiency towards selected substrates, and instability in the presence of organic co-solvents - to be overcome. We propose that strategies based on protein engineering and isolation of novel HLDs from extremophilic microorganisms may offer solutions.