Background After the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), “pandemic‐associated‐frailty” or profound health deterioration, in older adults has been considered a health concern. In this study, we sought to demonstrate whether pandemic‐associated‐frailty is occurring in Japan, where the population is aging, by showing the prevalence of frailty before and during the COVID‐19 outbreak, using the same method. Methods A total of 5222 older adults in Otawara City, Tochigi Prefecture, aged 70 and 75 were surveyed annually using a complete survey, excluding those who were certified as requiring long‐term care. Frailty during 2017–2019 before the COVID‐19 outbreak and during 2020–2021 during the COVID‐19 outbreak was determined using the Kihon Checklist (KCL). Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 test to compare annual frailty status and Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the scores. Results The frailty statuses over the five‐year period showed a significant decrease in Robust and a significant increase in Pre‐frailty and Frailty (p < 0.001). Frailty increased markedly during the second year of the pandemic. Based on the category, the scores deteriorated significantly for activities of daily living (p < 0.001), physical function (p = 0.003), oral function (p < 0.001), outdoor activity (p < 0.001), and depression (p < 0.001). Moreover, there was a significant deterioration in the total score for 25 items (p < 0.001). In addition, a significant deterioration was observed in the total score of 23 items, excluding the social withdrawal affected by self‐restraint life (p < 0.001). Conclusions The population prevalence of frailty in older adults increased steadily from the pre‐pandemic year through the first and second years of the pandemic. Based on the 25 questions of the KCL, two aspects including visiting friends and going out less stood out. This suggests that pandemic‐associated‐frailty occurred in Japan.

Background Among community-dwelling older adults who require long-term care and use outpatient rehabilitation services, we aimed to examine the characteristics of patients who discontinued using outpatient rehabilitation services to prevent exposure to COVID-19 and the effects of this discontinuation on patient frailty. Methods Participants were 119 older adults (69 males, 50 females; average age 77.3 ± 8.3 years) requiring long-term care who used outpatient rehabilitation services. Our outpatient rehabilitation service involved day care for older adults undergoing rehabilitation including pick-up and drop-off services under the long-term care insurance system. They were divided into two groups: participants who discontinued using outpatient rehabilitation services and participants who continued their use. To find the factors associated with this discontinuation, binomial logistic regression analysis was performed, in which the following independent variables were used: gender, age, height, weight, long-term care level, grip strength, and normal walking speed. Frailty status was investigated in April 2020 and again in September 2020 through interviews and telephone surveys utilizing the Frailty Screening Index. Results Women and normal walking speed were independent factors associated with the discontinuation of outpatient rehabilitation due to COVID-19. According to the results of the Frailty Screening Index, similar tendencies were exhibited in both April and September. The discontinued group indicated that they were getting less exercise and having stronger feelings of fatigue than the continuing group. Conclusions The findings are in accordance with other studies indicating that women are more likely to employ prevention measures against COVID-19, as seen among the community-dwelling older adults requiring long-term care who used outpatient rehabilitation services. People with higher levels of physical function were also likely to refrain from using outpatient rehabilitation services. Results further suggested that the discontinued group had more frailty-related factors (i.e., low physical activity and strong exhaustion) than the continuing group.

The Kihon Checklist (KCL) is used to assess frailty in daily life. We aimed to identify KCL items associated with the development of frailty and recovery to robust status during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: We conducted a 1-year prospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults aged 70 and 75 years in Otawara City, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. Information regarding age, sex, presence of disease and KCL items was collected in May 2020 (baseline) and June 2021 (follow-up) using a mailed questionnaire. Changes in frailty status as determined by the KCL at baseline and follow-up were evaluated. To clarify factors related to changes in the frailty status, we conducted two sets of binomial logistic regression analyses with the presence/absence of development of frailty and presence/absence of recovery to robust status at follow-up as the dependent variables and the KCL items as the independent variables. Results:The analysis included 716 participants who provided complete responses to both questionnaires. The KCL Items 6, 10, 20, 23 and 24 were related to the development of frailty, and the KCL Items 6, 15, 21 and 23 were associated with the recovery to robust status. Conclusions:The baseline KCL items regarding physical function and associated mental aspects were related to both development of frailty and recovery to robust status during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cognitive and depressive declines were associated with the development of frailty, while good oral environment and sense of fulfillment in life were associated with the recovery to robust status.

Background Recently, the concept of respiratory sarcopenia has been advocated, but evidence is lacking regarding which respiratory parameters are appropriate indicators. Therefore, we investigated the association between sarcopenia, respiratory function, and respiratory muscle strength to identify the most appropriate parameters for respiratory sarcopenia. Methods We included 124 older adults (67 men, 57 women; average age 77.2 ± 8.3 years) requiring long-term care/support who underwent Day Care for rehabilitation. Handgrip strength, usual gait speed, and skeletal muscle mass were measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Participants were then diagnosed with sarcopenia using the algorithm of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019. Parameters of respiratory function (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1.0], FEV1.0%, and peak expiratory flow rate) and respiratory muscle strength (maximal expiratory pressure [MEP] and maximal inspiratory pressure) were also measured according to American Thoracic Society guidelines. Respiratory parameters significantly related to sarcopenia were identified using binomial logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses. Results Seventy-seven participants were classified as having sarcopenia. Binomial logistic regression analysis showed that MEP was the only respiratory parameter significantly associated with sarcopenia. The cut-off MEP value for predicting sarcopenia was 47.0 cmH20 for men and 40.9 cmH20 for women. Conclusions The most appropriate parameter for assessing respiratory sarcopenia may be MEP, which is an indicator of expiratory muscle strength, rather than FVC, MIP, or PEFR, as suggested in previous studies. Measuring MEP is simpler than measuring respiratory function parameters. Moreover, it is expected to have clinical applications such as respiratory sarcopenia screening.