BackgroundPeople newly diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis (IA) request regular consultations and support from health professionals (HPRs) in rheumatology to manage physiological, emotional, and social challenges. Evidence suggests that providing a tailored tailormade multi-component self-management program may benefit disease management (1). However, there is a lack of evidence in interventions with multiple components targeting people newly diagnosed with IA.ObjectivesTo develop a complex evidence- and theory-based intervention in co-creation with patients and HPRs for better self-management in newly diagnosed people with IA in a rheumatology out-patient clinic.MethodsThis study followed the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework (2,3) for developing a complex intervention. The development phase comprised 1) identifying the evidence base, 2) identifying theory, 3) modelling process and outcomes, resulting in 4) a final description of all components and outcomes of the intervention.1) Identifying the evidence baseWe conducted two literature reviews, on which, we described a preliminary nurse-led intervention.2) Identifying theoryGiven the fact that the theory of Self-management is built upon Social Cognitive Theory (4) this was chosen as the underlying theory along with Acceptance and Commitment Theory (5) to support our communication strategy.3) Modelling process and outcomesThe preliminary intervention was discussed and further developed in seven workshops to ensure that the intervention was in accordance with patients’ needs and feasible in clinical practice. Three patients and 38 HPRs (nine therapists, 10 rheumatologists, one psychologist, one social worker, and 17 registered nurses) attended.During the workshops we identified the competencies needed in the HPRs delivering the intervention. In addition, relevant outcomes to measure self-management in a subsequent feasibility study were discussed. Discussions were digitally recorded and analysed using Thematic Analysis (6). Subsequently, the project group discussed the analysis and consensus was reached.Results4) Description of all components and outcomes of the interventionOur intervention, ready for testing in a feasibility study, was a 9-month nurse-led intervention, and consisted of four individual and two group sessions. A physiotherapist and an occupational therapist should attend the group sessions along with the nurse (Figure 1). All sessions should target inflammatory arthritis-specific self-management.Figure 1.Intervention activities andA comprehensive intervention manual has been developed. Our patient research partner and experts in rheumatology and self-management commented on the content to secure content validity. Subsequently, we conducted cognitive interviews with the HPRs to determine the face validity of the manual. In addition, we completed a two-day competence program to train HPRs in delivering the intervention.The selected patient reported outcomes were: Physical activity levels, Health assessment, Fatigue, Quality of life, Anxiety and depression, Illness intrusiveness, Illness perception, and Self-efficacy, supplemented with objective measures for diseases activity.ConclusionNISMA - a nurse-led complex self-management intervention embedded in a multidisciplinary team has been developed and described based on MRC’s framework for the development of complex interventions. The intervention is currently being tested in a feasibility study.References[1]Nikiphorou et al., Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 1. oct 2021.[2]Skivington et al., BMJ. 30. sep. 2021.[3]Craig et al., nt J Nurs Stud. may 2013.[4]Bandura A. SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY.[5]Newman et al., Lancet. oct 2004.[6]Braun et al., Springer; 2019.AcknowledgementsFirst, I would like to thank the patients and health professionals who attended the workshops.Secondly, I would like to thank The Novo Nordic Foundation for funding.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.