Objective: The syndrome of polycystic ovaries (PCOS) is a known risk factor for type 2 diabetes. It is not known, however, whether the increase in diabetes risk is related to endocrine abnormalities associated with PCOS such as hyperandrogenemia, or whether it is a consequence of the anthropometric or metabolic alterations frequently observed in PCOS women. Design: Since markers of inflammation are supposed to predict type 2 diabetes, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in combination with parameters of obesity, insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism were determined in 57 PCOS women and in 20 age-matched healthy controls. In addition, the C-174G IL-6 promoter polymorphism was analyzed as a determinant in influencing IL-6, obesity, and androgen levels in women. Results: Neither CRP nor IL-6 were significantly elevated in lean or obese PCOS women compared with age-matched lean or obese controls. In PCOS patients, variables of body composition (body mass index (BMI), waist to hip ratio, dual-energy X-ray-absorptiometry fat mass) and of insulin resistance were correlated with IL-6 or CRP, while parameters of hyperandogenism were not. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that obesity is the dominant force, thus explaining 18% and 24% of the IL-6 or CRP levels, respectively, in PCOS women. No association of IL-6 or BMI to a certain genotype at C-174G could be demonstrated in 50 PCOS patients. The heterozygous GC genotype, however, was associated with lower androstendione levels. Metformin treatment of 9 obese, insulin-resistant PCOS patients over a period of 6 months caused a significant decrease in body weight, body fat mass and total testosterone, but showed no significant decline in IL-6 or CRP concentrations. Conclusions: In PCOS women, plasma levels of IL-6 and CRP were not increased when compared with age-and BMI-matched controls. BMI was, however, the parameter most strongly related to IL-6 and CRP in PCOS; thus PCOS-related endocrine abnormalities do not appear to activate inflammatory parameters thereby enhancing the risk of diabetes. In PCOS, the type 2 diabetes risk may, therefore, be confined to those with obesity and/or metabolic alterations rather than affecting all women suffering from the syndrome.European Journal of Endocrinology 150 525-532

The syndrome of polycystic ovaries (PCOS) is associated with adiposity and metabolic changes predisposing to insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. Because the recently discovered GH secretagogue, ghrelin, is intimately involved in the control of appetite and weight regulation, we studied ghrelin levels in a group of 26 otherwise healthy women with PCOS. They were compared with 61 healthy female control subjects and 5 gastrectomized women. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and continuous infusion of glucose with model assessment (CIGMA) in all patients. In PCOS women, serum ghrelin levels were significantly lower than in healthy lean or obese controls (P < 0.001). In insulin-sensitive PCOS women, ghrelin concentrations compared well with the healthy controls, whereas in insulin-resistant PCOS ghrelin levels were significantly lower and indistinguishable from the low levels found in the gastrectomized women. There was a close correlation of ghrelin to insulin sensitivity (HOMA, r(2) = 0.330, P < 0.002; CIGMA, r(2) = 0.568, P < 0.0001). Treatment of 10 insulin-resistant PCOS women with metformin significantly increased circulating fasting ghrelin concentrations (P < 0.02). Ghrelin levels did not correlate to any of the parameters of hyperandrogenemia, to the LH/FSH ratio, to body mass index, or to fasting insulin and glucose concentrations. In summary, ghrelin levels are decreased in PCOS women and are highly correlated to the degree of insulin resistance. This suggests that ghrelin could be linked to insulin resistance in PCOS women. However, whether low ghrelin in PCOS is a cause or the consequence of insulin resistance awaits further investigations.

Summary Background Oral propranolol is widely prescribed as first‐line treatment for infantile haemangiomas (IHs). Anecdotally, prescribing practice differs widely between centres. Objectives The Propranolol In the Treatment of Complicated Haemangiomas (PITCH) Taskforce was founded to establish patterns of use of propranolol in IHs. Methods Participating centres entered data on all of their patients who had completed treatment with oral propranolol for IHs, using an online data capture tool. Results The study cohort comprised 1097 children from 39 centres in eight European countries. 76·1% were female and 92·8% had a focal IH, with the remainder showing a segmental, multifocal or indeterminate pattern. The main indications for treatment were periocular location (29·3%), risk of cosmetic disfigurement (21·1%) and ulceration and bleeding (20·6%). In total 69·2% of patients were titrated up to a maintenance regimen, which consisted of 2 mg kg−1 per day (85·8%) in the majority of cases. 91·4% of patients had an excellent or good response to treatment. Rebound growth occurred in 14·1% upon stopping, of whom 53·9% were restarted and treatment response was recaptured in 91·6% of cases. While there was no significant difference in the treatment response, comparing a daily maintenance dose of < 2 mg kg−1 vs. 2 mg kg−1 vs. > 2 mg kg−1, the risk of adverse events was significantly higher: odds ratio (OR) 1 vs. adjusted OR 0·70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·33–1·50, P = 0·36 vs. OR 2·38, 95% CI 1·04–5·46, P = 0·04, Ptrend < 0·001. Conclusions The PITCH survey summarizes the use of oral propranolol across 39 European centres, in a variety of IH phases, and could be used to inform treatment guidelines and the design of an interventional study.

Endometriosis is an oestrogen-dependent disease that is treatable by oestrogen withdrawal, a therapy that has been effectively provided by the use of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. Complete oestrogen withdrawal results in unacceptable side-effects, in particular in accelerated bone density loss. This problem has been effectively overcome with 'add-back therapy' using low-dose oestrogens and progestins in combination with a GnRH agonist to limit these side-effects, while still allowing regression of endometriotic lesions. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of using a subcutaneous injection of GnRH antagonist in the treatment of endometriosis. All patients (15/15; 100%) reported a symptom-free period during GnRH antagonist treatment, including mood changes, hot flushes, loss of libido, vaginal dryness and other symptoms. Serum oestradiol oscillated around a mean concentration of 50 pg/ml during therapy. Diagnostic laparoscopy before GnRH antagonist administration showed a mean stage III of disease. Regression occurred in 60% of cases (9/15) and the degree of endometriosis declined to stage II. Sequential administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix (Cetrotide) in a 3 mg dosage once weekly over 8 weeks creates a new opportunity for medical treatment of symptomatic endometriosis. Preserving basic oestrogen production during the course of treatment apparently does not influence regression of disease, and has no major side-effects.