Peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes (PNPS) are difficult to treat because commonly used analgesics are often ineffective when, for example, touch-evoked allodynia, hyperalgesia, and pain paroxysms are present. To investigate whether lidocaine patch 5% treatment is also effective in postherpetic neuropathy (PHN) and in other PNPS, 40 patients with various forms and localizations of PNPS completed a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way, cross-over study in three medical hospitals. Patients suffering from pain in a localized skin area with intensity above 40 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and a stable consumption of pain medication were included in this study. The study was divided into four phases: 3-day run-in phase, treatment phase 1, wash-out period, and treatment phase 2, each lasting 1 week. At the discretion of the patients, up to four patches (covering a maximum of 560 cm2) were applied onto the maximally painful area for 12 consecutive hours daily, always either by day or at night. Throughout the four phases, ongoing pain, allodynia, quality of neuropathic symptoms, quality of sleep, and adverse events were assessed. When, after the wash-out period, the pain intensity scores did not return to the pre-treatment values (+/-20%), these patients were excluded from the study. The present study revealed that, as an add-on therapy, the lidocaine patch 5% was clearly effective in reducing ongoing pain (P=0.017) and allodynia (P=0.023) during the first 8 h after application and that the patches also worked well over a period of 7 days (P=0.018) in diverse focal PNPS. Calculation of the numbers needed to treat (NNT) to obtain one patient with more than 50% relief of ongoing pain revealed that the NNT of 4.4 in the present study compared reasonably well with other studies of PHN, such as topically applied capsaicin (NNT: 5.3-infinity) or systemic treatment with gabapentin (NNT: 3.2-5.0).

EIT is suitable for monitoring the dynamic effects of PEEP variations on the regional change of tidal volume. It is superior to global ventilation parameters in assessing the beginning of alveolar recruitment and lung collapse.

Dynamic thoracic EIT is capable of detecting changes of the ventilation distribution in the lung. Nevertheless, it has yet to become an established clinical tool. Therefore, it is necessary to consider application scenarios wherein fast and distinct changes of the tissue conductivities are to be found and also have a clear diagnostic significance. One such a scenario is the artificial ventilation of patients suffering from the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). New protective ventilation strategies involving recruitment manoeuvres are associated with noticeable shifts of body fluids and regional ventilation, which can quite easily be detected by EIT. The bedside assessment of these recruitment manoeuvres will help the attending physician to optimize treatment. Hence, we performed an animal study of lavage-induced lung failure and investigated if EIT is capable of qualitatively as well as quantitatively monitoring lung recruitment during a stepwise PEEP trial. Additionally, we integrated EIT into a fuzzy controller-based ventilation system which allows one to perform automated recruitment manoeuvres (open lung concept) based on online PaO2 measurements. We found that EIT is a useful tool to titrate the proper PEEP level after fully recruiting the lung. Furthermore, EIT seems to be able to determine the status of recruitment when combining it with other physiological parameters. These results suggest that EIT may play an important role in the individualization of protective ventilation strategies.

Background: Anesthesia per se and pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery lead to atelectasis and impairment of oxygenation. We hypothesized that a ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery leads to a more homogeneous ventilation distribution as determined by electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Furthermore, we supposed that PEEP ventilation in lung-healthy patients would improve the parameters of oxygenation and respiratory compliance. Methods: Thirty-two patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to be ventilated with ZEEP (0 cmH 2 O) or with PEEP (10 cmH 2 O) and a subsequent recruitment maneuver. Differences in regional ventilation were analyzed by the EIT-based center-of-ventilation index (COV), which quantifies the distribution of ventilation and indicates ventilation shifts. Results: Higher amount of ventilation was examined in the dorsal parts of the lungs in the PEEP group. Throughout the application of PEEP, a lower shift of ventilation was found, whereas after the induction of anesthesia, a remark-