Stercoral ulceration results from impaction of hard fecal mass on the colonic wall and is a relatively unknown cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. In this report, we describe a case of lower gastrointestinal bleeding due to stercoral ulceration resulting from Sevelamer, a drug which is commonly associated with constipation.
Introduction: Given the negative outcomes associated with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, non-insulin therapies with glycemic, cardiovascular, and weight-loss benefits in the general population, such as the glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) have become a more alluring therapeutic option in transplant populations. However, limited evidence exists to demonstrate its safety and efficacy in solid organ transplant. Methods: This program evaluation included adult kidney, liver, lung transplant recipients initiated on a GLP1-RA for diabetes mellitus management for a minimum of 3 months, had at least one follow-up visit after starting therapy, and had at least one hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level drawn between 3–12 months after GLP1-RA initiation. Outcomes were assessed at time of initiation of GLP1-RA (baseline) and 3–12 months post-initiation. Nadir values between 3–12 months were utilized to assess outcomes. Results: One-hundred eighteen patients met study inclusion criteria. Seventy-percent of patients received a kidney transplant, 19.5% received a liver transplant, and 6.8% received a lung transplant. A statistically significant difference was observed in median fasting blood glucose and HbA1c at baseline to 3–12-month nadir (P < 0.0001). A significant weight loss benefit was also observed. The rate of adverse drug reactions was low. Seven-percent of patients experienced nausea, 4.2% developed pancreatitis, and 7.1% reported having had at least one hypoglycemic event. Discussion: This is the largest study evaluating GLP1-RA in organ transplantation and demonstrates GLP1-RA is both safe and effective. Further assessment on long-term use of these agents on cardiovascular and renal outcomes is still needed.
Introduction Recurrent urinary tract infections remain a challenge in solid organ transplant and have a negative impact on morbidity/mortality. Project Aim The purpose of this program evaluation was to determine the impact of methenamine on recurrent urinary tract infection in kidney and liver-kidney transplant recipients. Design This retrospective review included patients > 18 years of age who received a kidney or liver-kidney transplant. Patients were divided into the following groups: (1) Methenamine therapy initiation received methenamine for ≥ 180 days or (2) Non-methenamine therapy: did not receive recurrent urinary tract infection prophylaxis. A total of 60 patients were included. Results When comparing outcomes between methenamine therapy initiation and non-methenamine therapy group, a significant reduction in the rate of recurrent urinary tract infection was reported in the methenamine therapy initiation group (0.6 vs 1.3 per 180 patient days follow-up, P = 0.0005). A significant reduction was also noted with rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria, treatment failures, bacteremia, hospitalizations due to recurrent urinary tract infection, multi-drug resistant organism isolated, and the average duration of antibiotic use. A significant difference in the time to failure of methenamine therapy initiation versus non-methenamine therapy is noted up to 180 patient-days follow-up (RR 1.56, P = 0.0019). Conclusion This evaluation supported methenamine therapy for recurrent urinary tract infection in kidney and liver-kidney transplant. The most significant impact of methenamine recurrent urinary tract infection was seen in the first 30 days after initiation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.