No abstract

The structural changes involved in ligand-dependent activation of G protein-coupled receptors are not well understood at present. To address this issue, we developed an in situ disulfide cross-linking strategy using the rat M 3 muscarinic receptor, a prototypical G q -coupled receptor, as a model system. It is known that a tyrosine residue (Tyr 254 ) located at the C terminus of transmembrane domain (TM) V and several primarily hydrophobic amino acids present within the cytoplasmic portion of TM VI play key roles in determining the G protein coupling selectivity of the M 3 receptor subtype. To examine whether M3 receptor activation involves changes in the relative orientations of these functionally critical residues, pairs of cysteine residues were substituted into a modified version of the M 3 receptor that contained a factor Xa cleavage site within the third intracellular loop and lacked most endogenous cysteine residues. All analyzed mutant receptors contained a Y254C point mutation and a second cysteine substitution within the segment Lys 484-Ser 493 at the intracellular end of TM VI. Following their transient expression in COS-7 cells, mutant receptors present in their native membrane environment (in situ) were subjected to mild oxidizing conditions, either in the absence or in the presence of the muscarinic agonist, carbachol. The successful formation of disulfide cross-links was monitored by studying changes in the electrophoretic mobility of oxidized, factor Xa-treated receptors on SDS gels. The observed cross-linking patterns indicated that M 3 receptor activation leads to structural changes that allow the cytoplasmic ends of TM V and TM VI to move closer to each other and that also appear to involve a major change in secondary structure at the cytoplasmic end of TM VI. This is the first study employing aninsitudisulfidecross-linkingstrategytoexamineagonistdependent dynamic structural changes in a G proteincoupled receptor. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)1 constitute the largest class of signaling molecules in the mammalian genome (1-3).All GPCRs are predicted to share a conserved molecular architecture consisting of a bundle of seven ␣-helically arranged transmembrane domains (TM I-VII) linked by alternating intracellular and extracellular loops (Fig. 1). Despite the remarkable structural diversity of the ligands that exert their physiological functions via interaction with specific classes of GPCRs, all GPCRs are thought to share a conserved mechanism of activation. Several lines of evidence indicate that the binding of ligands to the extracellular side of the receptor leads to changes in the arrangement of distinct TM helices, which are then propagated to the intracellular surface of the receptor, thus enabling the receptor to recognize and activate specific classes of heterotrimeric G proteins (4 -7).Accumulating evidence suggests that GPCR activation may involve a change in the relative disposition of TM III and VI (4 -11). Elegant site-directed spin labeling studies (9) carried out with t...

Transmembrane domain 6 of the muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors is important in ligand binding and in the conformational transitions of the receptor but the roles of individual residues are poorly understood. We have carried out a systematic alanine-scanning mutagenesis study on residues Tyr381 to Val387 within the binding domain of the M(1) muscarinic ACh receptor. The seven mutations were then analyzed to define the effects on receptor expression, agonist and antagonist binding, and signaling efficacy. Tyr381Ala produced a 40-fold reduction in ACh affinity and a 50-fold reduction in ACh-signaling efficacy. Leu386Ala had similar but smaller effects. Asn382Ala caused the largest inhibition of antagonist binding. The roles of the hydroxyl group and benzene ring of Tyr381 were probed further by comparative analysis of the Tyr381Phe and Tyr381Ala mutants using three series of ligands: ACh analogs, azanorbornane- and quinuclidine-based ligands, and atropine analogs. These data suggested that the hydroxyl group of Tyr381 is primarily involved in forming hydrogen bond interactions with the oxygen atoms present in the side chain of ACh. We propose that this interaction is established in the ground state and preserved in the activated state of the receptor. In contrast, the Tyr381 benzene ring may form a cation-pi interaction with the positively charged head group of ACh that contributes to the activated state of the receptor but not the ground state. However, the hydroxyl group and benzene ring of Tyr381 both participate in interactions with azanorbornane- and quinuclidine-based ligands and atropine analogs in the ground state as well as the activated state of the receptor.

In this study, we employed an in situ disulfide cross-linking strategy to gain insight into the structure of the inactive and active state of the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Specifically, this study was designed to identify residues in TM I that are located in close to Cys532 (position 7.42), an endogenous cysteine residue present in the central portion of TM VII. Cysteine residues were substituted, one at a time, into 10 consecutive positions of TM I (Ala71-Val80) of a modified version of the M(3) muscarinic receptor that lacked most endogenous cysteine residues and contained a factor Xa cleavage site within the third intracellular loop. Following their expression in COS-7 cells, the 10 resulting cysteine mutant receptors were oxidized in their native membrane environment, either in the absence or in the presence of muscarinic ligands. Disulfide cross-link formation was monitored by examining changes in the electrophoretic mobility of oxidized and factor Xa-digested receptors on SDS gels. When molecular iodine was used as the oxidizing agent, the L77C receptor (position 1.42) was the only mutant receptor that displayed significant disulfide cross-linking, either in the absence or in the presence of muscarinic agonists or antagonists. On the other hand, when the Cu(II)-(1,10-phenanthroline)(3) complex served as the redox catalyst, muscarinic ligands inhibited disulfide cross-linking of the L77C receptor, probably because of impaired access of this relatively bulky oxidizing agent to the ligand binding crevice. The iodine cross-linking data suggest that M(3) muscarinic receptor activation is not associated with significant changes in the relative orientations of the outer and/or central segments of TM I and VII. In bovine rhodopsin, the residues present at the positions corresponding to Cys532 and Leu77 in the rat M(3) muscarinic receptor are not located directly adjacent to each other, raising the possibility that the relative orientations of TM I and VII are not identical among different class I GPCRs. Alternatively, dynamic protein backbone fluctuation may occur, enabling Cys532 to move within cross-linking distance of Leu77 (Cys77).