It has been suggested that the apical portion of a root canal is not adequately disinfected by typical instrumentation regimens. The purpose of this study was to determine whether instrumentation to sizes larger than typically used would more effectively remove culturable bacteria from the canal. Forty patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of apical periodontitis were recruited from the endodontic clinic. Mandibular cuspids (n = 2), bicuspids (n = 11), and molars (mesial roots) (n = 27) were selected for the study. Bacterial sampling was performed upon access and after each of two consecutive instrumentations. The first instrumentation utilized 1% NaOCI and 0.04 taper ProFile rotary files. The cuspid and bicuspid canals were instrumented to a #8 size and the molar canals to a #7 size. The second instrumentation utilized LightSpeed files and 1% NaOCl irrigation for further enlargement of the apical third. Typically, molars were instrumented to size 60 and cuspid/bicuspid canals to size 80. Our findings show that 100% of the cuspid/bicuspid canals and 81.5% of the molar canals were rendered bacteria-free after the first instrumentation sizes. The molar results improved to 89% after the second instrumentation. Of the (59.3%) molar mesial canals without a clinically detectable communication, 93% were rendered bacteria-free with the first instrumentation. Using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) were found between the initial sample and the samples after the first and second instrumentations. The differences between the samples that followed the two instrumentation regimens were not significant (p = 0.0617). It is concluded that simple root canal systems (without multiple canal communications) may be rendered bacteria-free when preparation of this type is utilized.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

ObjectivesThe evaluation of iatrogenic dentinal defects in extracted teeth may be influenced by extraction forces and prolonged dry times. The purpose of this study was to compare the presence of dentinal defects in freshly extracted, periodontally compromised teeth with those in a group of teeth with uncontrolled extraction forces and storage time.Materials and MethodsThe experimental group consisted of eighteen roots obtained from teeth extracted due to periodontal reasons with class II or III mobility. They were kept in saline and sectioned within 1 hour following extraction. The control group consisted of matched root types obtained from an anonymous tooth collection, consistent with previous dentinal defect studies. The slices were obtained at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex. The imaging process exposed all specimens to no more than 60 seconds of dry time. The × 12.8 magnification was used for the 9 mm slices and × 19.2 magnification for the 3 mm and 6 mm slices under light-emitting diode (LED) transillumination. The root canal spaces and periodontal tissues were masked to minimize extraneous factors that might influence the evaluators. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.ResultsDentinal defects were detected in 17% of the experimental group teeth, compared to 61% of control teeth (p = 0.015).ConclusionsLED transillumination assessment of freshly extracted roots with class II or III mobility showed smaller number of dentinal defects than roots with uncontrolled storage time and extraction forces. The use of freshly extracted roots with mobility should be considered for future dental defect assessment studies.