The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is a cost-effective tool that has been shown to improve patient safety. We explored the applicability and effectiveness of quality improvement methodology to implement the WHO checklist and surgical counts at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in Uganda between October 2012 and September 2013. Compliance rates were evaluated prospectively and monthly structured feedback sessions were held. Checklist and surgical count compliance rates increased from a baseline median (IQR [range]) of 29.5% (0-63.5 [0-67.0]) to 85.0% (82.8-87.5 [79.0-93.0]) and from 25.5% (0-52.5 [0-60.0]) to 83.0% (80.8-85.5 [69.0-89.0]), respectively. The mean all-or-none completion rate of the checklist was 69.3% (SD 7.7, 95% CI [64.8-73.9]). Use of the checklist was associated with performance of surgical counts (p value < 0.001; r(2) = 0.91). Pareto analysis showed that understaffing, malfunctioning and lack of equipment were the main challenges. A carefully designed quality improvement project, including stepwise incremental change and standardisation of practice, can be an effective way of improving clinical practice in low-income settings.

No abstract

Both transversus abdominis plane block and intrathecal morphine may produce prolonged postoperative analgesia, but the respective clinical outcomes of these anaesthetic techniques in resource-limited settings are not well described. We randomly assigned patients undergoing caesarean section to receive a hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) spinal anaesthetic followed by an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block, or a hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) spinal anaesthetic with 100 mcg intrathecal morphine, followed by a postoperative sham block. Supplemental postoperative analgesia included self-administered oral diclofenac 50 mg and paracetamol 1 g every 8 h. Numerical pain rating scores, the need for rescue medication, sideeffects and patient satisfaction were recorded at 8, 16 and 24 h. We enrolled a total of 130 patients, with 65 women in each group. The mean numerical rating score for intrathecal morphine vs. transversus abdominis plane blocks at 8 h were: at rest, 2.5 vs. 3.1 (p = 0.04); with coughing, 4.3 vs. 4.8 (p = 0.07); and with movement, 3.6 vs. 4.2 (p = 0.06). At 16 h, respective scores were: 2.9 vs. 3.1 (p = 0.40) at rest; 4.0 vs. 4.3 (p = 0.19) with coughing; and 4.8 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.33) with movement. At 24 h, the respective scores were: 2.9 vs. 2.3 (p = 0.01); 4.6 vs. 4.2 (p = 0.04) with coughing; and 3.9 vs. 3.4 (p = 0.02) with movement. The need for rescue medication and the incidence of pruritis, sedation and nausea and vomiting were similar in both groups. Patient satisfaction with pain control was similar in both groups, with the majority of patients reporting satisfaction as good or excellent. Intrathecal morphine and transversus abdominis plane block provided clinically similar outcomes for pain relief after caesarean section.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) expedites return to patient baseline and functional status by reducing surgical trauma, stress, and organ dysfunction. Despite the potential benefits of enhanced recovery protocols, limited research has been done in low-resource settings, where 95% of cesarean deliveries are emergent and could possibly benefit from the application of ERAS protocols. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial, mothers delivering by emergency cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to either an ERAS or a standard of care (SOC) recovery arm. Patients in the ERAS arm were treated with a modified ERAS protocol that included modified counseling and education, prophylactic antibiotics, antiemetics, normothermia, restrictive fluid administration, and multimodal analgesia. They also received early initiation of mobilization, feeding, and urethral catheter removal. The primary end point was length of hospital stay. The secondary end points were complications and readmission rates. Mean length of stay in the intervention and control arms were compared using t tests. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 13 (College Station, TX). RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were enrolled in the study, with 80 randomized to each arm. There was a statistically significant shorter length of stay for the ERAS arm compared to SOC, with a difference of −18.5 hours (P < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI], −23.67, −13.34). The incidence of complications of severe pain and headache was lower in the ERAS arm compared to SOC (P = .001 for both complications). However, pruritus was more common in the ERAS arm compared to SOC (P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: Use of an ERAS protocol for women undergoing emergency cesarean delivery in a low-income setting is feasible and reduces length of hospital stay without generally increasing the complication rate.