On a trial level, there is a strong association between ORR and PFS. An association between ORR and OS and between PFS and OS was not established, possibly because of cross-over and longer survival after progression in the targeted therapy and first-line trials. The patient-level analysis showed that responders have a better PFS and OS compared with nonresponders. A therapy in advanced NSCLC with a large magnitude of effect on ORR may have a large PFS effect.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to atezolizumab and pembrolizumab in April and May 2017, respectively, for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are not eligible for cisplatin‐containing chemotherapy. These approvals were based on efficacy and safety data demonstrated in the two single‐arm trials, IMvigor210 (atezolizumab) and KEYNOTE‐052 (pembrolizumab). The primary endpoint, confirmed objective response rate, was 23.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.2%–32.2%) in patients receiving atezolizumab and 28.6% (95% CI: 24.1%–33.5%) in patients receiving pembrolizumab. The median duration of response was not reached in either study and responses were seen regardless of PD‐L1 status. The safety profiles of both drugs were generally consistent with approved agents targeting PD‐1/PD‐L1. Two ongoing trials (IMvigor130 and KEYNOTE‐361) are verifying benefit of these drugs. Based on concerning preliminary reports from these trials, FDA revised the indications for both agents in cisplatin‐ineligible patients. Both drugs are now indicated for patients not eligible for any platinum‐containing chemotherapy or not eligible for cisplatin‐containing chemotherapy and whose tumors/infiltrating immune cells express a high level of PD‐L1. The indications for atezolizumab and pembrolizumab in patients who have received prior platinum‐based therapy have not been changed. This article summarizes the FDA thought process and data supporting the accelerated approval of both agents and the subsequent revision of the indications. Implications for Practice The accelerated approvals of atezolizumab and pembrolizumab for cisplatin‐ineligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma represent the first approved therapies for this patient population. These approvals were based on single‐arm trials demonstrating reasonable objective response rates and favorable durations of response with an acceptable toxicity profile compared with available non‐cisplatin‐containing chemotherapy regimens. However, based on concerning preliminary reports from two ongoing phase III trials, the FDA revised the indication for both agents in cisplatin‐ineligible patients. Both are now indicated either for patients not eligible for any platinum‐containing chemotherapy or not eligible for cisplatin‐containing chemotherapy and whose tumors have high expression of PD‐L1.

BackgroundProgress toward reducing the malaria burden in Africa has been measured, or modeled, using datasets with relatively short time-windows. These restricted temporal analyses may miss the wider context of longer-term cycles of malaria risk and hence may lead to incorrect inferences regarding the impact of intervention.Methods1147 age-corrected Plasmodium falciparum parasite prevalence (PfPR2-10) surveys among rural communities along the Kenyan coast were assembled from 1974 to 2014. A Bayesian conditional autoregressive generalized linear mixed model was used to interpolate to 279 small areas for each of the 41 years since 1974. Best-fit polynomial splined curves of changing PfPR2-10 were compared to a sequence of plausible explanatory variables related to rainfall, drug resistance and insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) use.Results P. falciparum parasite prevalence initially rose from 1974 to 1987, dipped in 1991–92 but remained high until 1998. From 1998 onwards prevalence began to decline until 2011, then began to rise through to 2014. This major decline occurred before ITNs were widely distributed and variation in rainfall coincided with some, but not all, short-term transmission cycles. Emerging resistance to chloroquine and introduction of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine provided plausible explanations for the rise and fall of malaria transmission along the Kenyan coast.ConclusionsProgress towards elimination might not be as predictable as we would like, where natural and extrinsic cycles of transmission confound evaluations of the effect of interventions. Deciding where a country lies on an elimination pathway requires careful empiric observation of the long-term epidemiology of malaria transmission.