A first-ever spinal cord imaging meeting was sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust and the Wings for Life Foundation with the aim of identifying the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, the current greatest challenges, and greatest needs for future development. This meeting was attended by a small group of invited experts spanning all aspects of spinal cord imaging from basic research to clinical practice. The greatest current challenges for spinal cord imaging were identified as arising from the imaging environment itself; difficult imaging environment created by the bone surrounding the spinal canal, physiological motion of the cord and adjacent tissues, and small cross-sectional dimensions of the spinal cord, exacerbated by metallic implants often present in injured patients. Challenges were also identified as a result of a lack of “critical mass” of researchers taking on the development of spinal cord imaging, affecting both the rate of progress in the field, and the demand for equipment and software to manufacturers to produce the necessary tools. Here we define the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, discuss the underlying theory and challenges, and present the evidence for the current and potential power of these methods. In two review papers (part I and part II), we propose that the challenges can be overcome with advances in methods, improving availability and effectiveness of methods, and linking existing researchers to create the necessary scientific and clinical network to advance the rate of progress and impact of the research.

Purpose: Rechallenge with temozolomide (TMZ) at first progression of glioblastoma after temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (TMZ/RT!TMZ) has been studied in retrospective and single-arm prospective studies, applying temozolomide continuously or using 7/14 or 21/28 days schedules. The DIRECTOR trial sought to show superiority of the 7/14 regimen.Experimental Design: Patients with glioblastoma at first progression after TMZ/RT!TMZ and at least two maintenance temozolomide cycles were randomized to Arm A [one week on (120 mg/m 2 per day)/one week off] or Arm B [3 weeks on (80 mg/m 2 per day)/one week off]. The primary endpoint was median timeto-treatment failure (TTF) defined as progression, premature temozolomide discontinuation for toxicity, or death from any cause. O 6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation was prospectively assessed by methylationspecific PCR.Results: Because of withdrawal of support, the trial was prematurely closed to accrual after 105 patients. There was a similar outcome in both arms for median TTF [A: 1.8 months; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.8-3.2 vs. B: 2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5] and overall survival [A: 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.7-13.0) vs. B: 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.1-11.6)]. Median TTF in patients with MGMT-methylated tumors was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-7.4) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8-2) in MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival rates at 6 months (PFS-6) were 39.7% with versus 6.9% without MGMT promoter methylation.Conclusions: Temozolomide rechallenge is a treatment option for MGMT promoter-methylated recurrent glioblastoma. Alternative strategies need to be considered for patients with progressive glioblastoma without MGMT promoter methylation. Clin Cancer Res; 21(9); 2057-64. Ó2015 AACR.

SUMMARY:The relevant aspects of cholesteatomas are reviewed with the emphasis on their diagnosis by using cross-sectional imaging. The indications and limitations of CT and MR imaging and the use of novel MR imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cholesteatomas are described. HRCT of the temporal bone has an excellent spatial resolution, thus even small soft-tissue lesions can be accurately delineated (high sensitivity). However, CT has poor specificity (ie, soft-tissue structures cannot be differentiated). MR imaging with the conventional sequences (T1WI, T2WI, postcontrast T1WI) provides additional information for distinguishing different pathologic entities and for accurately diagnosing primary (nonsurgical) and residual/recurrent (surgical) cholesteatomas. Higher diagnostic specificity is achieved by introducing DW-EPI, delayed postcontrast imaging, DW-non-EPI, and DWI-PROPELLER techniques. Studies using DW-non-EPI and DWI-PROPELLER sequences show promising results related to improved diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for even small (Ͻ5 mm) cholesteatomas, thus allowing avoidance of second-look surgery in the future.ABBREVIATIONS: DWI ϭ diffusion-weighted imaging; DW-EPI ϭ diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging; DWI-PROPELLER ϭ diffusion-weighted imaging with periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction; DW-non-EPI ϭ diffusion-weighted non-echo-planar imaging; EAC ϭ external auditory canal; EACC ϭ external auditory canal cholesteatoma; EPI ϭ echo-planar imaging; FIESTA ϭ fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition; FLASH ϭ fast low-angle shot; HRCT ϭ high-resolution CT; NPV ϭ negative predictive value; PPV ϭ positive predictive value; T1WI ϭ T1-weighted imaging; T2WI ϭ T2-weighted imaging; TM ϭ tympanic membrane C holesteatoma has been known for more than 300 years in the medical literature; still its precise detection with the use of cross-sectional imaging techniques remains challenging. As before, the diagnosis of a cholesteatoma at first presentation is mainly based on clinical suspicion. HRCT provides information about bony changes and intracranial complications; however, it is inaccurate for characterizing the soft-tissue mass in the temporal bone. In the past 7 years, improvements in MR imaging techniques have enhanced the sensitivity and specificity of radiologic diagnosis, which may lead to future avoidance of second-look surgeries in cases of residual/recurrent cholesteatomas.The purpose of this review article is to summarize all aspects of cholesteatomas, including their definition, history, etymology, epidemiology, classification, histology, pathophysiology, clinical signs, and neuroradiologic diagnosis. We review the latest studies on the application of new MR imaging techniques for the accurate diagnosis of cholesteatomas. Definition"Cholesteatoma" is a well-demarcated non-neoplastic lesion in the temporal bone, which is commonly described as "skin in the wrong place." History and EtymologyJoseph-Guichard Duverney, a French anatomist, was the first to d...

A first-ever spinal cord imaging meeting was sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust and the Wings for Life Foundation with the aim of identifying the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, the current greatest challenges, and greatest needs for future development. This meeting was attended by a small group of invited experts spanning all aspects of spinal cord imaging from basic research to clinical practice. The greatest current challenges for spinal cord imaging were identified as arising from the imaging environment itself; difficult imaging environment created by the bone surrounding the spinal canal, physiological motion of the cord and adjacent tissues, and small crosssectional dimensions of the spinal cord, exacerbated by metallic implants often present in injured patients. Challenges were also identified as a result of a lack of “critical mass” of researchers taking on the development of spinal cord imaging, affecting both the rate of progress in the field, and the demand for equipment and software to manufacturers to produce the necessary tools. Here we define the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, discuss the underlying theory and challenges, and present the evidence for the current and potential power of these methods. In two review papers (part I and part II), we propose that the challenges can be overcome with advances in methods, improving availability and effectiveness of methods, and linking existing researchers to create the necessary scientific and clinical network to advance the rate of progress and impact of the research.

Brain activation during motor imagery has been the subject of a large number of studies in healthy subjects, leading to divergent interpretations with respect to the role of descending pathways and kinesthetic feedback on the mental rehearsal of movements. We investigated patients with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) to find out how the complete disruption of motor efferents and sensory afferents influences brain activation during motor imagery of the disconnected feet. Eight SCI patients underwent behavioral assessment and functional magnetic resonance imaging. When compared to a healthy population, stronger activity was detected in primary and all non-primary motor cortical areas and subcortical regions. In paraplegic patients the primary motor cortex was consistently activated, even to the same degree as during movement execution in the controls. Motor imagery in SCI patients activated in parallel both the motor execution and motor imagery networks of healthy subjects. In paraplegics the extent of activation in the primary motor cortex and in mesial non-primary motor areas was significantly correlated with the vividness of movement imagery, as assessed by an interview. The present findings provide new insights on the neuroanatomy of motor imagery and the possible role of kinesthetic feedback in the suppression of cortical motor output required during covert movements.