No abstract

Family presence during brain death evaluation improves understanding of brain death with no apparent adverse impact on psychological well-being. Family presence during brain death evaluation is feasible and safe.

No abstract

Severe injury remains a leading cause of death and morbidity in patients under 40, with the number of annual trauma-related deaths approaching 160,000 in the United States. Patients who survive the initial trauma and post-traumatic resuscitation are at risk for immune dysregulation, which contributes to late mortality and accounts for approximately 20% of deaths after traumatic injury. This post-traumatic immunosuppressed state has been attributed to over-expression of anti-inflammatory mediators in an effort to restore host homeostasis. We measured a panel of monocyte markers and cytokines in 50 severely injured trauma patients for 3 days following admission. We made the novel observation that the subpopulation of monocytes expressing high levels of CD14 and CD16 was expanded in the majority of patients. These cells also expressed CD163 consistent with differentiation into alternatively activated macrophages with potential regulatory or wound-healing activity. We examined factors in trauma plasma that may contribute to the generation and activation of these cells. The percentage of CD14highCD16+ monocytes after trauma correlated strongly with plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) levels. We demonstrate a role for TGF-β and M-CSF, but not CRP in generating these cells using monocytes from healthy volunteers incubated with plasma from trauma patients. CD16 is a receptor for CRP and IgG, and we showed that monocytes differentiated to the CD14highCD16+ phenotype produced anti-inflammatory cytokines in response to acute phase concentrations of CRP. The role of these cells in immunosuppression following trauma is an area of ongoing investigation.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and gut ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury cause reversible liver injury. Because nitric oxide (NO) can have both beneficial and deleterious effects in the gastrointestinal tract, and because the role of NO in gut I/R-induced hepatic injury is unknown, this study examined its role in LPS and gut I/R-induced hepatic injury in the rat. Both LPS and gut I/R caused a similar increase in serum hepatocellular enzymes. LPS but not gut I/R caused a significant increase in upregulation of hepatic inducible NO synthase (iNOS) according to quantitative real-time RT-PCR and Western immunoblot analysis. Aminoguanidine, a selective iNOS inhibitor, attenuated LPS-induced hepatic injury and hypotension, but did not prevent gut I/R-induced hepatic injury. In contrast, the non-selective NOS inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester aggravated liver damage from both LPS and gut I/R. These data indicate that iNOS plays a role in mediating LPS-induced hepatic injury, but not gut I/R-induced hepatic injury. The data also suggest that the constitutive isoforms of NOS play a hepatoprotective role in both models of hepatic injury.