This study was designed to assess brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as a possible candidate for enhanced cognition in breastfed infants. The study was conducted on 42 infants, 4-6 months old, who were classified according to their feeding pattern into breastfed group, formula-fed group and mixed-feeding group. Each infant was subjected to history taking, clinical examination, estimation of the level of BDNF by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) technique and assessment by Bayley scale of infant development-second edition (BSID-II). The current study revealed that breastfed group had higher BSID-II scores followed by mixed-fed group then formula-fed one, yet these results reached statistical significance only in total behaviour rating scale (TBRS) and Motor Quality Percentile rank values. Additionally, breastfed infants had significantly higher values of BDNF when compared to those receiving formula milk. Negative correlations between BDNF and both weight for age and weight for length scores were detected. Furthermore, significant positive correlation was detected between BDNF and TBRS. Regression analysis studies revealed that breastfeeding is the most determinant factor for BDNF, TBRS and Motor Quality Percentile rank values. Serum BDNF levels are significantly higher in breastfed infants and shows positive correlations with the results of BSID-II. Given that simultaneous increase in brain BDNF occurs due to onsite production, transport from the periphery or both, it is prudent to hypothesize that BDNF could be one of the factors responsible for the enhanced cognition detected in breastfed infants.

No abstract

This study was designed to assess the plausibility of an association between natural rotavirus infection and intussusception. It was conducted on 21 infants suffering from acute gastroenteritis (GE) complicated by intussusception who were compared to another 40 age- and sex-matched infants suffering from acute GE characterized by watery nonmucoid diarrhea without surgical complications. All enrolled patients were subjected to detailed history documentation, thorough clinical examination and laboratory investigations, complete stool analysis, and detection of rotavirus antigen in stools using the ELISA technique. Plain abdominal X-ray and ultrasound were also performed. The results of this study revealed 24 positive cases for rotavirus antigen in the stools of the acute uncomplicated GE patients (60.0%), while there were only ten positive cases in the intussusception group (47.6%). No significant difference in severity was detected between the two groups studied, especially in terms of signs of dehydration and need for IV fluids (p > 0.05). Most of the rotavirus positive cases among the intussusception group presented either in February or December (p < 0.05) with no significant seasonal pattern among the acute GE group (p > 0.05). In conclusion, rotavirus antigen retrieval from stools of GE patients complicated with intussusception was not statistically different from those detected among acute uncomplicated GE. Additionally, there was no association between seasonality or severity of rotavirus positive cases in acute GE patients and those with intussusception. It is thus prudent to say that wild rotavirus infection in GE patients does not carry an extra risk for the occurrence of intussusception.

No abstract

No abstract