Sessile plants possess an assembly of signaling pathways that perceive and transmit environmental signals, ultimately resulting in transcriptional reprogramming. Histone is a key feature of chromatin structure. Numerous histone-modifying proteins act under different environmental stress conditions to help modulate gene expression. DNA methylation and histone modification are crucial for genome reprogramming for tissue-specific gene expression and global gene silencing. Different classes of chromatin remodelers including SWI/SNF, ISWI, INO80, and CHD are reported to act upon chromatin in different organisms, under diverse stresses, to convert chromatin from a transcriptionally inactive to a transcriptionally active state. The architecture of chromatin at a given promoter is crucial for determining the transcriptional readout. Further, the connection between somatic memory and chromatin modifications may suggest a mechanistic basis for a stress memory. Studies have suggested that there is a functional connection between changes in nuclear organization and stress conditions. In this review, we discuss the role of chromatin architecture in different stress responses and the current evidence on somatic, intergenerational, and transgenerational stress memory.

No abstract

Cis-regulatory elements are regions of non-coding DNA that regulate the transcription of neighboring genes. The study of cis-element architecture that functions in transcription regulation are essential. AAAG and ACGT are a class of cis-regulatory elements, known to interact with Dof and bZIP transcription factors respectively, and are known to regulate the expression of auxin response, gibberellin response, floral development, light response, seed storage proteins genes, biotic and abiotic stress genes in plants. Analysisof the frequency of occurrence of AAAG and ACGT motifs from varying spacer lengths (0 to 30 base pair) between these two motifs in both possible orientations–AAAG (N) ACGT and ACGT (N) AAAG, in the promoters and genome of Arabidopsis thaliana which indicated preferred orientation of AAAG (N) ACGT over ACGT (N) AAAG across the genome and in promoters. Further, microarray analysis revealed the involvement of these motifs in the genes downregulated under jasmonic acid response in an orientation-independent manner. These results were further confirmed by the transient expression studies with promoter-reporter cassettes carrying AAAG and ACGT motifs in both orientations. Furthermore, cluster analysis on genes with AAAG (N) ACGT and ACGT (N) AAAG motifs orientations revealed clusters of genes to be involved in ABA signaling, transcriptional regulation, DNA binding, and metal ion binding. These findings can be utilized in designing synthetic promoters for the development of stress-tolerant transgenic plants and also provides an insight into the roles of these motifs in transcriptional regulation.

Background: Plant yield closely depends on its environment and is negatively affected by abiotic stress conditions like drought, salinity, heat, and cold. Analysis of the stress-inducible genes in Arabidopsis has previously shown that CCGAC and CATGTG play a crucial role in controlling the gene expression through the binding of DREB/CBF and NAC TFs under various stress conditions, mainly drought and salinity. Methods: The pattern of these motifs is conserved, which has been analyzed in this study to find the mechanism of gene expression through spacer specificity, inter motif distance preference, functional analysis, and statistical analysis for four different plants, namely Oryza sativa, Triticum aestivum, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Glycine max. Results: The spacer frequency analysis has shown a preference for particular spacer lengths among four genomes. The spacer specificity at all the spacer lengths which predicts dominance of particular base pairs over others, was analyzed to find the preference of the sequences in the flanking region. Functional analysis on stress-regulated genes for saline, osmotic, and heat stress clearly shows that these motif frequencies with inter motif distance (0-30) in the promoter region of Arabidopsis are highest in genes which are upregulated by saline and osmotic stress and downregulated by heat stress. Conclusion: Microarray data were analyzed to confirm the role of both motifs in stress response pathways. Transcription factors seem to prefer larger motif size with repeated CCGAC and CATGTG elements. The common preference for one spacer was further validated through Box and Whisker’s statistical analysis.