Purpose: Anlotinib, a newly developed oral small-molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been shown to have encouraging activity against sarcoma. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of chemotherapy combined with anlotinib plus anlotinib maintenance in advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients in a real-world setting in China. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected the medical data of thirty-two patients with advanced/metastatic STS who received chemotherapy combined with anlotinib plus anlotinib maintenance therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The progression-free rates (PFRs) at three and six months, the progression-free survival (PFS) time, and adverse events were recorded. Results: On the basis of investigator assessments, two patients (6%) achieved CR (complete response) and nine patients (28%) achieved PR (partial response), with an ORR of 34%. Eleven patients (34%) achieved SD (stable disease), and ten patients (31%) achieved PD (progression disease), with a DCR of 69%. The progression-free rates (PFRs) at three and six months were 81% and 69%, respectively. The median PFS time was 8.2 months. The hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were manageable. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (9%), leukopenia (19%), thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (6%), anorexia (6%), vomiting (3%), and hypertension (6%). The combination therapy was generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Our study suggests that chemotherapy combined with anlotinib plus anlotinib maintenance therapy had good efficacy and resulted in more favorable survival with good tolerance among patients with advanced/metastatic STS.

The aim of this study was to correlate matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression with the clinicopathological features and outcome of patients with early gastric cancer and to clinically elucidate more information on the role of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 protein overexpression with regard to lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer. The levels of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 protein expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry. An association was observed between matrix metalloproteinase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and matrix metalloproteinase-2/matrix metalloproteinase-9 overexpression and clinicopathological factors, such as ulceration and lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and matrix metalloproteinase-2/matrix metalloproteinase-9 overexpression both were strongly correlated with histological grade. In addition, matrix metalloproteinase-2/matrix metalloproteinase-9 overexpression correlated with deep invasion. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression were both independent factors of overall survival in patients with early gastric cancer. In novelty, we found that matrix metalloproteinase-2/matrix metalloproteinase-9 overexpression was an independent indicator of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer which will be helpful in clinic to select the appropriate treatment of these patients.

ObjectiveMore effective regimens for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are urgently needed. Therefore, a retrospective study concerning the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus cisplatin (nab-TP) versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus cisplatin (sb-TP) as a first-line therapy was conducted in Chinese patients with advanced ESCC.MethodsFrom June 2009 to June 2015, 32 patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on the first and eighth days (30 minutes infusion) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) on the second day every 21 days (nab-TP arm). Also, 43 patients were treated with solvent-based paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) intravenously on the first and eighth days and the same dose of cisplatin (sb-TP arm). The two groups were compared in terms of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. OS and PFS were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods to determine associations between chemotherapy regimens and survival outcomes.ResultsNab-TP demonstrated a higher ORR (50% vs 30%; P=0.082) and disease control rate (81% vs 65%; P=0.124) than sb-TP. Median OS was similar for nab-TP and sb-TP (12.5 vs 10.7 months; P=0.269). However, nab-TP resulted in a longer median PFS (6.1 months [95% confidence interval: 5.3–6.9]) than sb-TP (5.0 months [95% confidence interval: 4.4–5.6]) (P=0.029). The most common adverse events included anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia in both the groups and no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. With statistically significant differences, significantly less grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy, arthralgia, and myalgia occurred in the nab-TP arm (all P<0.05). Dose reduction, treatment delays, and second-line therapy were similar between the two regimens. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group.ConclusionNab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin is found to be an effective and tolerable option for advanced ESCC in the People’s Republic of China.