To clarify whether pre‐operalive transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) improves survival after hepatectomy, a prospective randomized comparative study was done. Of a total of 115 registered patients having solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 2 to 5 cm in diameter, 18 (15.7%) were excluded after randomization. As a result, 97 patients were chosen as subjects and divided into two groups: hepatectomy with (group A: n = 50) and without (group B: n=47) pre‐operative TAE. The period of observation of the patients who survived the surgery was between 4.0 and 6.6 years. The randomization appeared to have provided well‐balanced groups of patients and the clinico‐pathological characteristics of the two groups were quite similar. The necrotic part of the cancerous lesions, as confirmed by operative specimens, amounted to 74.8 ±33.4% (mean±SD) in group A and 6.8 ±7.2% in group B (P<0.01). However, the cancer‐free survival rates after hepatectomy in both groups showed little difference (39.1±7.0 (%±SE) and 31.1±0.1, respectively). We speculate that TAE is not effective against such HCC accessory lesions as minute intrahepatic metastasis and tumor thrombus and that pre‐operative TAE does not improve post‐operative survival.
Massive bladder hemorrhage was sucessfully treated by selective embolization of the unilateral vesical artery in two patients with vesical neoplasms. In one patient, complete hemostasis was obtained by partial occlusion of the unilateral vesical artery, although the lesion had another feeding vessel from the contralateral artery. This method is simple and effective in controlling massive bladder hemorrhage, as it has the advantages of minimizing ischemic pain, preventing the hazards due to extensive infarction and reflux of embolic material, and reducing tumor bulk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.