Background Patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) have high survival rates when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab, an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, can preserve high survival rates and reduce treatment toxicity is unknown. Methods In a randomized, non-inferiority, multicenter trial, patients with locoregionally-advanced p16-positive OPC were stratified by American Joint Committee on Cancer T (T1-T2 vs. T3-T4) and N (N0-N2a vs. N2b-N3), Zubrod Performance Status (0 vs. 1), and tobacco smoking history (≤ vs. >10 pack-years) and randomized 1:1 to radiotherapy plus cetuximab 400 milligrams per square meter of body surface area (mg/m2), followed by 250 mgs/m2 for seven weekly doses or cisplatin 100 mgs/m2 for two doses, 21 days apart. The sample size was 800 eligible patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with non-inferiority margin 1.45 (hazard ratio). Findings From June 2011 through July 2014, 849 patients (805 eligible; 399 cetuximab; 406 cisplatin) were randomized at 182 centers in the United States and Canada. With median follow-up 4·5 years, radiotherapy plus cetuximab did not meet the non-inferiority criterion for OS. Estimated 5-year OS was 77·9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73·4-82·5) in cetuximab group versus 84·6% (95%CI=80·6-88·6) in cisplatin group (hazard ratio [HR], 1·45, 1-sided 95% upper CI, 1·94; non-inferiority p=0·5056; 1-sided log-rank p=0.0163). PFS was significantly lower in cetuximab group than in cisplatin group (HR 1·72, 95%CI=1·29-2·29; 5-year rates, 67·3% vs. 78·4%), and LRF was significantly higher (HR 2·05, 95%CI=1·35-3·10; 5-year rates, 17·3% vs. 9·9%). The rate of moderate-to-severe toxicity that was acute (77·4% vs. 81·7%, p=0·1586) and late (16·5 vs. 20·4%, p=0·1904) was similar in the cetuximab and cisplatin groups, respectively. Interpretation For patients with HPV-positive OPC, radiotherapy plus cetuximab demonstrated inferior OS and PFS compared to radiotherapy plus cisplatin; toxicity rates were similar (NCT01302834). Funding National Cancer Institute USA, Eli Lilly and The Oral Cancer Foundation

No abstract

IMPORTANCESkin cancer is the most common malignancy occurring after organ transplantation. Although previous research has reported an increased risk of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients (OTRs), no study has estimated the posttransplant population-based incidence in the United States. OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence and evaluate the risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), melanoma (MM), and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) in a cohort of US OTRs receiving a primary organ transplant in 2003 or 2008. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter retrospective cohort study examined 10 649 adult recipients of a primary transplant performed at 26 centers across the United States in the Transplant Skin Cancer Network during 1 of 2 calendar years (either 2003 or 2008) identified through the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database. Recipients of all organs except intestine were included, and the follow-up periods were 5 and 10 years.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Incident skin cancer was determined through detailed medical record review. Data on predictors were obtained from the OPTN database. The incidence rates for posttransplant skin cancer overall and for SCC, MM, and MCC were calculated per 100 000 person-years. Potential risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer were tested using multivariate Cox regression analysis to yield adjusted hazard ratios (HR).RESULTS Overall, 10 649 organ transplant recipients (mean [SD] age, 51 [12] years; 3873 women [36%] and 6776 men [64%]) contributed 59 923 years of follow-up. The incidence rates for posttransplant skin cancer was 1437 per 100 000 person-years. Specific subtype rates for SCC, MM, and MCC were 812, 75, and 2 per 100 000 person-years, respectively. Statistically significant risk factors for posttransplant skin cancer included pretransplant skin cancer (

The rate of an antiepileptic drug (AED) rash is approximately five times greater in patients with another AED rash (8.8%) vs those without (1.7%). Rash rates were highest with phenytoin, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine and low (<1%) with several AEDs.

PURPOSE The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one. RECOMMENDATIONS For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .