BackgroundThe ability to redirect the path of the foot during walking is critical for responding to perturbations and maintaining upright stability. The purpose of the current study was to compare mechanisms of reactive stepping adjustments in young versus older adults when responding to an unexpected perturbation during voluntary step initiation.MethodsWe tested 13 healthy community-dwelling older adults and an equal number of young control participants performing stepping movements onto a visual target on the floor. In some trials, perturbations were introduced by unexpectedly shifting the target, at various time points, from its usual location to a new location 20 cm to the right. We measured ground reaction forces under the supporting leg and three-dimensional kinematics of the stepping leg in baseline and target shift trials.ResultsDuring target shift trials, that is, when reactive adjustments were required, older adults demonstrated the following: delayed responses in modifying the lateral propulsive forces under the supporting foot, reduced rates of lateral force production, delayed responses in modifying the stepping foot trajectory, and prolonged movement execution times.ConclusionsThe current study quantitatively distinguishes between healthy older and young adults in generating reactive stepping adjustments to an unpredictable shift of a visual target. The decreased capability for rapidly planning and executing an effective voluntary step modification could reveal one potential cause for the increased risk of falls in the older population.

Purpose:(1) Determine whether ultrasonography can detect differences in diaphragm contractility between body positions. (2) Perform reliability analysis of diaphragm thickness measurements in each test condition.Methods:We used a repeated-measures experimental design with 45 healthy adults where 3 B-mode ultrasound images were collected at peak-inspiration and end-expiration in supine, sitting, and standing. Mean diaphragm thickening fractions were calculated for each test position. Statistical significance was tested using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with planned comparisons. For reliability analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient (3, 3) was calculated.Results:Mean diaphragm thickening fraction increased from 60.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 53.0%, 67.9%) in supine, to 96.5% (95% CI 83.2%, 109.9%) while seated and to 173.8% (95% CI 150.5%, 197.1%) while standing. Body position was a significant factor overall (P < .001), as were comparisons between each individual position (P < .001). Intraobserver reliability was excellent (>0.93) for all body positions tested.Conclusions:Ultrasound imaging detected positional differences in diaphragm contractility. The effect of gravitational loading on diaphragm length-tension, and body position-mediated changes in intra-abdominal pressure may explain the differences found. Future research should address methodological concerns and apply this method to patients participating in early mobilization programs in the intensive care unit.

It has been suggested that feedforward planning of gait and posture is diminished in older adults. Motor adaptation is one mechanism by which feedforward commands can be updated or fine-tuned. Thus, if feedforward mechanisms are diminished in older adults, motor adaptation is also likely to be limited. The purpose of the study was to compare the ability of healthy older versus young adults in generating a voluntary stepping motor adaptation in response to a novel visual sensory perturbation. We recorded stepping movements from 18 healthy older and 18 young adults during baseline and adaptation stepping blocks. During baseline, the stepping target remained stationary; in adaptation, a visual perturbation was introduced by shifting the target laterally during mid-step. We compared adaptation between groups, measured by improvements in endpoint accuracy and movement duration. Older adults adapted stepping accuracy similarly to young adults (accuracy improvement: 29.7 ± 27.6% vs. 37.3 ± 22.9%, older vs. young group respectively, p = 0.375), but showed significant slowness during movement. Thus older adults were able to achieve accuracy levels nearly equivalent to younger adults, but only at the expense of movement speed, at least during the early adaptation period (movement duration: 1143.7 ± 170.6 ms vs. 956.0 ± 74.6 ms, p < 0.001). With practice, however, they were able to reduce movement times and gain speed and accuracy to levels similar to young adults. These findings suggest older adults may retain the ability for stepping adaptations to environmental changes or novel demands, given sufficient practice.