The role of ethics in organizational crisis management has received limited but growing attention. However, the majority of research has focused on applications of ethical theories to managing crisis events after they have occurred, as opposed to the implications of ethical theories for the primary prevention of these situations. The relationship between concepts derived from a contemporary ethic of care (
The field of modern organizational crisis management emerged largely in response to the 1982 cyanide tampering of Tylenol capsules (Mitroff, 2001). Since that time, a substantial body of scholarly research and practical wisdom has developed. Despite the use of psychological research by crisis management scholars, organizational crisis management has received substantially less attention within psychology itself. This article provides an overview of the field and highlights current frameworks for understanding the stages of organizational crisis/ response. It extends previous theory by applying the "levels of prevention" framework often used in community and health psychology and by offering a new assessment tool based on the "4 factor" (4 P) framework used in clinical assessment. Areas for psychological consultation and research are discussed. I thank Ian R. Newby-Clark for his helpful comments on a draft of this article.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.