Introduction The outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses an unprecedented challenge to healthcare workers (HCWs) globally. This study investigated potential factors related to depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of Chinese HCWs during the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic. Methods An online survey was distributed to Chinese HCWs using respondent-driven sampling. Data were collected between February 13th and February 20th, 2020, immediately following the COVID-19 contagion peak in Hubei. A total of 1208 respondents were eligible for analysis. Mental health problems and social support were measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) and the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSS). Results The prevalence rates of depression, (DASS-depression > 9) anxiety (DASS-anxiety > 7) and stress (DASS-stress > 14) were 37.8%, 43.0% and 38.5%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regressions revealed that stress, anxiety, and depression were positively related to lower levels of social support, longer working hours, discrimination experience and workplace violence. The scarcity of medical equipment was correlated with increased stress and depression. Chinese HCWs working at COVID 19 designated hospitals were more likely to report anxiety. Additionally, volunteering to work in the frontline health facilities was inversely associated with depression. Conclusion Mental health problems among Chinese HCWs were alarming during the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic. Health facilities require appropriate and standing services that address the mental health of healthcare workers, particularly during epidemic outbreaks.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to present the design, model, and data analysis of an interrupted time series (ITS) model applied to evaluate the impact of health policy, systems, or environmental interventions using count outcomes. Simulation methods were used to conduct power and sample size calculations for these studies.MethodsWe proposed the models and analyses of ITS designs for count outcomes using the Strengthening Translational Research in Diverse Enrollment (STRIDE) study as an example. The models we used were observation-driven models, which bundle a lagged term on the conditional mean of the outcome for a time series of count outcomes.ResultsA simulation-based approach with ready-to-use computer programs was developed to calculate the sample size and power of two types of ITS models, Poisson and negative binomial, for count outcomes. Simulations were conducted to estimate the power of segmented autoregressive (AR) error models when autocorrelation ranged from −0.9 to 0.9, with various effect sizes. The power to detect the same magnitude of parameters varied largely, depending on the testing level change, the trend change, or both. The relationships between power and sample size and the values of the parameters were different between the two models.ConclusionThis article provides a convenient tool to allow investigators to generate sample sizes that will ensure sufficient statistical power when the ITS study design of count outcomes is implemented.
ObjectiveTo study the association between glucose metabolism disorders and hepatotropic virus infection.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from the REACTION study (Risk Evaluation of Cancers in Chinese Diabetic Individuals: A Longitudinal Study). Outcomes of the analysis were test results of kidney function, liver function, lipid metabolism, and the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and potential hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (positive hepatitis C virus antibody) among individuals with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) or pre-diabetes mellitus (pre-DM).ResultsOf the 10,080 patients who participated in the study, 7665 eligible subjects were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of HBV infection between DM and normal subjects, pre-DM and normal subjects, and DM or pre-DM and normal subjects (p-values of 0.9180, 0.8154, and 0.6448, respectively). There was also no significant difference in the prevalence of potential HCV infection between DM and normal subjects, pre-DM and normal subjects, and DM or pre-DM and normal subjects (p-values of 0.1190, 0.0591, and 0.5591, respectively). Lipid metabolism showed a significant difference between DM or pre-DM subjects and normal subjects (p-values were less than 0.0221 in all cases). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed hypertension as the leading significant variable associated with DM, pre-DM, and both. Other significant factors included gender, body mass index, age, and alanine aminotransferase.ConclusionNo significant association was detected between DM or pre-DM and HBV or potential HCV infection. Significant association was detected between lipid metabolism disorders and DM, but this association was absent in pre-DM patients when adjusting for other factors.
Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of ensemble methods to improve the prediction of fetal macrosomia and large for gestational age from prenatal ultrasound imaging measurements. Methods: We evaluated and compared the prediction accuracies of nonlinear and quadratic mixed-effects models coupled with 26 different empirical formulas for estimating fetal weights in predicting large fetuses at birth. The data for the investigation were taken from the Successive Small-for-Gestational-Age-Births study. Ensemble methods, a class of machine learning techniques, were used to improve the prediction accuracies by combining the individual models and empirical formulas. Results: The prediction accuracy of individual statistical models and empirical formulas varied considerably in predicting macrosomia but varied less in predicting large for gestational age. Two ensemble methods, voting and stacking, with model selection, can combine the strengths of individual models and formulas and can improve the prediction accuracy. Conclusions: Ensemble learning can improve the prediction of fetal macrosomia and large for gestational age and have the potential to assist obstetricians in clinical decisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.