This investigation aimed to compare the response of young and older adult men to bed rest (BR) and subsequent rehabilitation (R). Sixteen older (OM, age 55-65 yr) and seven young (YM, age 18-30 yr) men were exposed to a 14-day period of BR followed by 14 days of R. Quadriceps muscle volume (QVOL), force (QF), and explosive power (QP) of leg extensors; single-fiber isometric force (Fo); peak aerobic power (V̇o2peak); gait stride length; and three metabolic parameters, Matsuda index of insulin sensitivity, postprandial lipid curve, and homocysteine plasma level, were measured before and after BR and after R. Following BR, QVOL was smaller in OM (-8.3%) than in YM (-5.7%,P= 0.031); QF (-13.2%,P= 0.001), QP (-12.3%,P= 0.001), and gait stride length (-9.9%,P= 0.002) were smaller only in OM. Fo was significantly smaller in both YM (-32.0%) and OM (-16.4%) without significant differences between groups. V̇o2peakdecreased more in OM (-15.3%) than in YM (-7.6%,P< 0.001). Instead, the Matsuda index fell to a greater extent in YM than in OM (-46.0% vs. -19.8%, respectively,P= 0.003), whereas increases in postprandial lipid curve (+47.2%,P= 0.013) and homocysteine concentration (+26.3%,P= 0.027) were observed only in YM. Importantly, after R, the recovery of several parameters, among them QVOL, QP, and V̇o2peak, was not complete in OM, whereas Fo did not recover in either age group. The results show that the effect of inactivity on muscle mass and function is greater in OM, whereas metabolic alterations are greater in YM. Furthermore, these findings show that the recovery of preinactivity conditions is slower in OM.
Cushing's syndrome requires a screening test of high sensitivity, followed by biochemical evaluation of the source of the tumor when the cause is ACTH dependent. The high-dose dexamethasone suppression test is still in common use as an aid in differential diagnosis, although its value has been queried. We have routinely used the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test for many years in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome but noticed that patients with pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome or Cushing's disease, usually showed some degree of suppression of their serum cortisol, compared to those with the ectopic ACTH syndrome. We therefore analyzed retrospectively the serum cortisol responses during the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test and the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test in 245 patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome and compared the diagnostic utility of each test either alone or in combination with a standard test using CRH. Evaluation of the serum cortisol response at 24 and 48 h during the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test correctly identified 98% of patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome and distinguished between pituitary and ectopic causes with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 79%. In the same patients, the serum cortisol response to the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test had a slightly higher sensitivity (91%) and specificity (80%). However, the combined criteria of a more than 30% suppression of serum cortisol during the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test and/or a more than 20% increase in the CRH test had a significantly higher sensitivity (97%) and specificity (94%) than either the high-dose dexamethasone or the CRH tests alone in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. It produced equivalent information to that when high-dose and CRH test results were combined. We therefore conclude that in our patient series, the serum cortisol response during the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test is highly sensitive in diagnosing Cushing's syndrome and, combined with the results of the serum cortisol response to the CRH test, offered a safe and cost-effective test in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. There does not appear to be any necessity for retaining the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test in this diagnostic work-up.
The present study was undertaken to evaluate antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of root extract against streptozotocin induced diabetes in experimental rats to scientifically validate its use against diabetes in some parts of India. Ethanolic extract, showing the highest activity in in vitro experiments, was prepared in saline and administered orally to streptozotocin induced albino Wistar diabetic rats for 21 days. Biochemical parameters liver and muscles glycogen and in vivo antioxidant activity in normal, diabetic control, standard (metformin) and treated animals were determined and compared. Attempt was made to isolate, purify and characterize one of the major secondary metabolites in extract by range of chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques. Treatment of streptozotocin induced diabetic rats with ethanolic root extract (500 mg/kg) caused significant ( < 0.01) reduction in blood glucose (312-178 mg/dL), increase in body weight (181-219 g) and serum insulin (1.28-2.26 IU/dL). It also maintained lipid profile and tests of liver and kidney functions within normal range as compared to diabetic control rats and almost with standard drug metformin. The oxidative stress induced decline in glutathione and catalase in liver and kidney tissues showed recovery nearly to normal level as a function of treatment. The GC-MS profile of the extract showed relatively high concentration of β-sitosterol which was characterized by different spectroscopic and chromatographic techniques. The result scientifically and comprehensively validate the reported use of roots of this indigenous plant against diabetes. A strong antioxidant activity of the ethanolic root extract suitably compliments the antidiabetic effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.