No abstract

No abstract

ObjectiveTo analyze the outcomes of sequential or sandwich chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer (EC).MethodsData from 4 centers were collected retrospectively for 179 patients with stage IIIC EC treated with postoperative RT and ChT (paclitaxel and carboplatin). Patients were either treated with 6 cycles of ChT followed by RT (sequential arm; 96 patients) or with 3 cycles of ChT, RT, and an additional 3 cycles of ChT (sandwich arm; 83 patients). Prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.ResultsThe 5-year OS and PFS rates were 64% and 59%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 5–167 months). The 5-year OS rates were significantly higher in the sandwich than sequential arms (74% vs. 56%; p=0.03) and the difference for 5-year PFS rates was nearly significant (65% vs. 54%; p=0.05). In univariate analysis, treatment strategy, age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, pathology, rate of myometrial invasion, and grade were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, non-endometrioid histology, advanced FIGO stage, and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT were negative predictors for OS, whereas only non-endometrioid histology was a prognostic factor for PFS.ConclusionPostoperative adjuvant ChT and RT for stage IIIC EC patients, either given sequentially or sandwiched, offers excellent clinical efficacy and acceptably low toxicity. Our data support the superiority of the sandwich regimen compared to the sequential strategy in stage IIIC EC patients for OS.

No abstract

Treatment options for recurrent/metastatic sinonasal cancer (RMSNC) patients are limited. We present two cases with RMSNC treated with a combination of immune checkpoint blockade and hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT). Case 1 presented with RMSNC three months after the primary treatment. The patient progressed under first-line chemotherapy and pembrolizumab was offered. The disease progressed after the sixth cycle. We performed reirradiation with HSRT to the primary site. Case 2 presented with local recurrence eight years after the primary treatment for maxillary sinus cancer. He refused surgery and chemotherapy and was offered nivolumab treatment. After two doses, we performed reirradiation with HSRT.Case 1 showed regression at both the local and the metastatic sites after radiotherapy. The second patient’s symptoms resolved completely three months after radiotherapy.The HSRT and immune checkpoint blockade combination is a promising treatment option for patients with RMSNC.

Although age limited the delivery of aggressive treatment, concurrent chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients associated with improved outcomes similar as in younger counterparts without increasing serious acute and late toxicities.

Purpose: To evaluate dosimetric differences between point-based 2-dimensional (2D) vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) treatment planning technique and volume-based 3-dimensional (3D) VBT method for endometrial cancer (EC).Material and methods: Ten patients with uterine-confined EC treated with VBT were included in this study. All patients received 27.5 Gy in 5 fractions. Three different treatment plans were performed for each patient: plan A for dose prescribed to the entire vaginal wall thickness delineated via computed tomography guidance, plan B for dose prescribed to the vaginal mucosa/cylinder surface, and plan C for dose prescribed to 5 mm beyond the vaginal mucosa/cylinder surface. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) of treatment volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated and compared.Results: DVH analysis of target volume doses (D 100 , D 95 , and D 90 ) showed a significant difference between plan A and plan B (p = 0.005), and plan B was found lower. D 100 for plan C was significantly higher than plan A (p = 0.009), but for D 95 and D 90 , no statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.028 and p = 0.028, respectively). In terms of OARs doses, including vagina, rectum, bladder, and sigmoid, D 2cm 3 doses were significantly higher in plan A than plan B (p = 0.009, p = 0.009, p = 0.005, and p = 0.005, respectively). All these doses were also significantly lower than in plan C (p = 0.005, p = 0.012, and p = 0.013, respectively), except for sigmoid (p = 0.155).Conclusions: In this dosimetric analysis, we have shown that the volume-based 3D VBT technique provides the ability to balance the target dose against the sparing of OARs. Therefore, in the new modern 3D treatment era, instead of normalization of the dose to standard reference points, customized 3D volume-based VBT planning should be recommended.

Background: We sought to determine the outcomes of adjuvant small pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and prognostic factors for survival and disease control. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 113 cervical cancer patients treated with postoperative median 50.4-Gy small pelvic EBRT. We treated the surgical bed, bilateral parametria, paravaginal soft tissues, upper third of the vagina, and presacral lymphatics. Results: Median follow-up of all patients and survivors was 58 and 67 months, respectively. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates were 91 and 82%, and 85 and 74%, respectively. The locoregional failure rate was 10%. Age was a significant predictor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) on univariate analysis. The number of dissected lymph nodes being < 30 negatively affected the pelvic recurrence-free survival. The only independent predictor on multivariate analysis was older age for DMFS. Although no severe acute toxicity was observed, late grade ≥ 3 toxicity developed in 8 patients. Conclusion: Small pelvic EBRT produces satisfactory survival and locoregional control with acceptable toxicity, and can be an alternative to whole pelvic EBRT in selected cervical cancer patients.