OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify the variables that predict the revolving door phenomenon in psychiatric hospital at the moment of a second admission. METHODS: The sample consisted of 3,093 patients who have been followed during 5 to 24 years after their first hospital admission due to schizophrenia, and affective or psychotic disorders. Those who had had four or more admissions during the study period were considered as revolving door patients. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of gender, age, marital status, urban conditions, diagnosis, mean period of stay on the first admission, interval between the first and second admissions on the patterns of hospitalization. RESULTS: The variables with the highest predictive power for readmission were the interval between first and second admissions, and the length of stay in the first admission. CONCLUSIONS: These data may help public health planners in providing optimal care to a small group of patients with more effective utilization of the available services.

Os autores apresentam uma análise da reforma psiquiátrica do Rio Grande do Sul, utilizando uma perspectiva histórica e uma abordagem por três vertentes: a psiquiatria institucional; os desenvolvimentos na área extra-hospitalar; e as políticas de saúde implementadas ao longo dos anos. A partir do referencial adotado, foi revisada a experiência brasileira e a do Rio Grande do Sul em particular, tendo como fontes: os bancos de dados MEDLINE e Lilacs e documentos oficiais do Ministério da Saúde e da Secretaria Estadual de Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul. Hoje, após 14 anos da promulgação da Lei Estadual nº 9716, que dispõe sobre a reforma psiquiátrica no Rio Grande do Sul e determina a substituição progressiva dos hospitais psiquiátricos por uma rede de atenção integral em saúde mental, nota-se que o número de leitos psiquiátricos foi reduzido em 35%, e a proposta de implantação da rede "alternativa" de assistência ao doente mental não foi implementada da forma preconizada, tampouco de maneira igualitária. Tendo em vista que os atuais desafios, tais como o fenômeno da "porta giratória" e o paciente crônico, refletem a necessidade de extensão dos cuidados primários e secundários, a experiência do Rio Grande do Sul permite pôr em discussão a possibilidade de modificação da estratégia, de tal modo que, ao invés de tentar estruturar um "sistema dentro do sistema", como hoje está colocado, possa-se tirar melhor proveito da integração da saúde mental aos programas-eixo do SUS, como o Programa de Saúde da Família e o Programa de Agentes Comunitários de Saúde.

No abstract

No abstract

IntroductionThe work was developed with the people hospitalized in the period of 1 year in a psychiatric clinic in Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil. 175 patients who presented dual diagnosis were evaluated.ObjectivesThe research aims to know the distribution of the most frequent psychiatric diagnosis associated with the disorders for the use of psychoactive substances. The work also has as objective to assess the treatment of patients carrying these disorders so that there is a better efficiency of the individual treatment plan.MethodsThe work consisted of the evaluation of all patients who were admitted to the clinic in the period of 1 year, using the ICD-10 for the diagnosis of dual pathologies. All the patients were assessed by the multiprofessional team, composed by general practicioner, psychiatrist, psychologist, pharmaceutic, therapist in chemical dependence, family therapist and physiotherapist. The patients were treated with the use of psychopharms, cognitive behavioral psychotherapy, 12-step program, art therapy and moderate physical activity. Family members of all patients were also interviewed.ResultsIn the evaluation conducted by the team, it was found the following distribution of the most frequent diagnosis associated to disorder for the use of psychoactive substances: depression (26.3%), personality disorder (22.9%), bipolar disorder (22.3%), non-schizophrenic psychosis (12.6%), schizophrenia (9.1%), and other diagnosis (6.8%).ConclusionsThe formulation of the dual diagnosis provided a better approach of the patients on the part of the team, promoting the strengthening of the therapeutic bond and causing positive impact on the evolution of these disorders.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.