This paper addresses the use of traffic speed deflection devices for the structural evaluation of pavements at the network-level. At the heart of the decision making process is the pavement management system (PMS), which provides condition indices or scores for each pavement segment in the network. Current PMS are driven by distress and ride quality as key pavement condition indicators. Both merit emphasis within the PMS process, but another important indicator to making rational pavement investment decisions is the structural adequacy, which is most often determined based on deflection testing.
In the past few years, state transportation departments in the United States have been investigating the potential use of the traffic speed deflectometer (TSD) in routine network-level pavement structural evaluation, including efforts to compute parameters typically obtained with the falling weight deflectometer (FWD). However, differences in loading configuration (single plate versus dual tires) and mechanism (impact versus moving load) between the FWD and the TSD necessitate modification of conventional analysis methodologies for use with TSD data. The TSD is a trailer truck that uses Doppler lasers to measure the pavement deflection velocities at normal traffic speed. Deflection velocities are then converted to surface deflections with a computational algorithm. This study proposes two approaches to backcalculating layer moduli from the TSD data. The first method uses 3D-Move software and deflection velocities measured directly by the TSD. The 3D-Move software can closely simulate TSD loading by considering moving load, nonuniform contact pressure of the dual tires, and viscoelastic material properties of asphalt layers. The second method uses TSD-computed surface deflections in a linear elastic analysis backcalculation program modified to incorporate a dual-tire configuration. The two methods were evaluated with field data from the MnROAD test facility and two in-service pavement sections in Pennsylvania and Idaho. The results show that the second method can be reliably used in network-level applications until the first method becomes computationally practical. The limitations of use of the TSD deflection measurement in the conventional FWD backcalculation program was also demonstrated.
In this paper, the traffic speed deflectometer (TSD), a device used for network level structural evaluation, is assessed. TSD testing was performed in nine states on a total of 5,928 miles (some repeated) during three time periods: November 2013, May to July 2014, and June to September 2015. This paper presents (1) the results of repeatability and comparison of the TSD with the falling weight deflectometer (FWD), (2) the results of the comparison of TSD measurements with typical pavement management system (PMS) data, and (3) an approach that can be implemented by State Highway Agencies (SHAs) to incorporate indices derived from TSD data into their PMS decision-making process. The results show that repeated TSD measurements follow similar trends and the TSD measurements and FWD measurements on the same pavement sections follow similar trends as well. Comparing TSD measurements with PMS surface condition data confirmed that the TSD provided valuable information about the structural condition of the tested pavement sections that cannot be derived from the already available pavement surface condition as part of an agency’s PMS. An example of how TSD information can be used to refine the triggered maintenance treatment category as part of a network-level PMS analysis is presented for a roughly 75-mile section of I-81 south in Virginia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.