Objective: To investigate the laterality of the normal asymmetry of the human face, examining differences in laterality in relation to sex, growth stage, and skeletal classification. Materials and Methods: A total of 1800 Japanese subjects (651 males and 1149 females; mean age, 15 years 3 months; range, 4 years 2 months to 59 years 11 months) were selected. Individuals in the sample were categorized according to sex, one of three growth stages, and one of three skeletal patterns. Differences in length between distances from the points at which ear rods were inserted to the facial midline and the perpendicular distance from the soft-tissue menton to the facial midline were measured on a frontal facial photograph. Subjects with a discrepancy of more than 3 standard deviations of the measurement error were categorized as having left-or right-sided laterality. Results: Of subjects with facial asymmetry, 79.7% had a wider right hemiface, and 79.3% of those with chin deviation had left-sided laterality. These tendencies were independent of sex, age, or skeletal jaw relationships. In this regard, during pubertal growth, the proportion of subjects with wider right hemiface decreased (P Ͻ .0001), whereas the proportion of those with a wider left hemiface increased (P Ͻ .01), despite a consistent tendency for right-sided dominance. Conclusion: These results suggest that laterality in the normal asymmetry of the face, which is consistently found in humans, is likely to be a hereditary rather than an acquired trait.
Objectives: To examine (1) the laterality of asymmetry in movements of the right and left corners of the mouth in space during voluntary smile and (2) the laterality of asymmetry in relation to the difference between the right and left hemiface size and the handedness. Materials and Methods: Participants were 155 volunteer Japanese female adults. They were categorized into the symmetric group (n 5 120) and the right-side hemiface dominant group (n 5 26) according to the hemiface size. In addition, the symmetric group was categorized into the righthanded group (n 5 98) and the left-handed group (n 5 22) according to the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Position vectors of the right and left corners of the mouth were obtained from the threedimensional facial images for the rest, the maximal lip corner retraction, and the portrait smile. The displacements of the right and left corners of the mouth for each expression and the proportions of the subjects with the right-and left-sided laterality were compared. Results: The left corner of the mouth showed significantly greater displacement (P , .01) than the right in the symmetric group for the portrait smile. The left-sided laterality was found regardless of the handedness. Conclusions: Displacements of the right and left corners of the mouth during voluntary smile were asymmetric, and the left-sided laterality was found. Also, the laterality of the facedness differed in relation to the hemiface size, but was not related to the handedness. (Angle Orthod. 2010;80:223-229.)
This report describes a case of successful orthodontic treatment using maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis with an internal maxillary distractor and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in a girl with cleft lip and palate. A 16-year-old girl with unilateral cleft lip and palate exhibited midface retrusion because of growth inhibition of the maxillary complex and mandibular excess. After the presurgical orthodontic treatment, 6.0-mm advancement of the maxillary anterior segment and 4.0-mm set back of the mandible were performed. After a retention period, the patient's midface convexity was greatly improved and the velopharyngeal competence was preserved without relapse.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.