No abstract

Background: Telepharmacy can help deliver pharmaceutical advice from an expert pharmacist to another party, such as a physician, inexperienced pharmacist, or pharmacy technician. In this study, we consider term “2-person discussions” as teleconsultation between expert pharmacists to each of the aforementioned persons. Objectives: This study has 2 aims: first to prioritize 2-person discussions between the parties involved in telepharmacy services when we have limited budget and time and would like to implement the best efficient telepharmacy system. Second to examine the barriers and benefits of implementing a telepharmacy. Methods: The research population included 40 pharmacists working in Kerman pharmacies (Iran). Their viewpoints were evaluated using a valid and reliable researcher-made questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire focused on professional-demographic information, while the second part addressed the most important 2-person discussions and also asked about barriers to and benefits of implementing telepharmacy. Results: The findings indicate that the following 2-person discussions are priority for implementation: physician-pharmacist, pharmacist-hospital ward, and pharmacist-pharmacist. Payment and reimbursement issues and lack of access to information technology infrastructure were among the most important barriers. Efficient training about medicine usage, drug-drug interactions, and adverse effects was the most important benefit of telepharmacy. Conclusion: In this study, pharmacists’ first priority regarding who to involve in a 2-person telepharmacy consultation was to establish a long-distance connection between physicians and pharmacists. This finding indicates that the pharmacists were more interested in providing teleconsultation services to physicians and other pharmacists rather than communicating with pharmaceutical technicians.

Introduction:The increasing prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in developing countries has become a worldwide concern. This problem is preventable by timely diagnosis and treatment; however, in the majority of cases, patients attend the eye clinics very late because of a lack of specialists and travel difficulties. Running a teleophthalmology system would significantly help to manage this disease. Aim: This study seeks to assess the accuracy of the teleophthalmology system and its effect on reducing unnecessary referrals in Iran. Methods: This study was conducted on 125 diabetic patients. First, the patients were examined by a retina specialist using a slit lamp and, then, single-field digital photos were captured by a portable, low-cost fundus camera. The images were uploaded onto a website and, after two months, were assessed by two retina specialists and two general practitioners (GPs). Finally, the diagnoses based on the digital photos were contrasted with the diagnoses established through face-to-face visits as a gold standard. Results:Out of 125 diabetic patients, eight (6.4%) were removed because of low-quality images and a total of 117 were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of each retina specialist presented with the photographs produced success rates of 90% and 97% respectively when judged against the gold standard of face-to-face visits. The rates of sensitivity for retinopathy referrals from the retina specialists were 92% and 85%. The sensitivity and specificity of their diagnoses of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) were calculated at 93% and 100%. The rates of sensitivity for each GP were 95% and 93% and the level of specificity was estimated to be approximately 98% for both GPs. The diagnosis rate for GPs when viewing the photographs as opposed to hosting face-to-face visits was more than 90%. Generally, with the implementation of this system, between 40% and 55% of referrals were calculated to have been avoidable. Conclusion: Our results from the first-ever research conducted on this topic in Iran showed that the teleophthalmology system is extremely accurate, that it can prevent unnecessary referrals and that it is useful for locating treatable patients. The results of this study could be of assistance in the running and expansion of such systems throughout Iran and Kerman Province to reduce eye damage arising from diabetes, decrease avoidable referrals to clinics, increase the availability of specialist visits for people in remote and rural areas and optimize the use of clinical infrastructures for patients in emergencies.

Introduction: Telepediatric is one of the subspecialties of telemedicine that can be defined as the use of information and communication technology tools to offer healthcare services to children at a distance. Aim: The use of telepediatric healthcare services for children living in rural or deserved areas may reduce the cost and time of travel to access these services. This study aims to review published papers that assess the percentage of avoided travel or referrals with the use of telepediatric. Methods: This is a systematic review study. PubMed database was searched in September 2019 to retrieve the published papers. The final 24 retrieved papers were assessed based on the variables such as modality, referral setting, specialty, continent, weight, and percentage of avoided travel. The multivariate linear regression model was used to estimate the percentage of travel avoidance by telepediatric. Results: The linear regression model was determined based on the provided specialty for telepediatric (cardiology, general (multi), and other (rehabilitation, dermatology, psychiatry, respiratory)) with R2 =0.41. The results showed that the mean percentage of avoided travel in cardiology specialty as a baseline was 56%. The use of telepediatric in the general (multi) and other specialties can avoid travel for 26.5% (p=0.02) and 85% (p=0.03) respectively. Conclusion: This study showed that telepediatric could reduce travel at least 26.5% and maximal 85%. These results can be used by healthcare providers to decide on the implementation of successful telepediatric systems to reduce referrals.

No abstract