This study examines the causes and consequence of financial restatements in Indonesia. The first part focuses on the impact of corporate governance on restatements. Thirty six restating firmsand thirty four nonrestating firms were collected during 2010-2014. Using logistic regression, the results show that audit committeewith financial expertise is negatively related to financial restatements. On the other hand, no significant results found for board of commissioners and institutional ownership.The second part of this studyfocuses on the impact of financial restatement on management turnover. Management turnover refers to the likelihood of chief director (president director) and directors losing their jobs in 24 month periods after financial restatement. The results show that restating firms executives are more likely to lose their jobs than their counterpart in nonrestating companies. More specifically, 79% of restating companies changed their executives compares to only 38% of non-restating firms. The results of this paper would be a warning for managers to credibly report financial statements in accordance with sound accounting policies because financial restatements may cause managers to lose his job. In addition, the results are beneficial for policy makers in setting the rules to promote good corporate governance. This study determines management turnover by observing annual report. If the composition of executives in current year differs from last year, then it is decided that there has been a management turnover regardless of the causes. Subsequent research should isolate management turnover causing by other factors such as retirements. This is crucial to minimize the impact of extraneous variables.
Financial statements may help investors in estimating firm’s future performance. The sooner they are published, the more relevant the information for making investment decision. A delay in the release of financial statements may result from audit delay. Audit delay is a period of time the process of auditing measured from the date book company up to date stated in a report auditor independent. This study examines the factors that can influence the audit delay period for public companies on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014 to 2018. The independent variables used in this study are the existence of the governance committee, the size of the audit committee, the reputation of the firm (KAP), the company's complexity, profits and audit opinion. Employing purposive sampling method, this study collect final sample of 1866 companies which used to test the hypotheses. Using logistic regression. the evidents show that the existence of the governance committee, KAP reputation, and profit were negatively associated with audit delay. Meanwhile, firm complexity was positively associated with audit delay. In addition, the size of the audit committee has no effect on audit delay. Abstrak Laporan keuangan membantu investor mengestimasi kinerja perusahaan di masa depan. Semakin cepat laporan keuangan dipublikasikan maka semakin relevan digunakan dalam pengambilan keputusan investasi. Keterlambatan pelaporan keuangan bisa dipucu oleh audit delay. Audit delay adalah jangka waktu penyelesaian proses audit yang diukur dari tanggal tutup buku perusahaan hingga tanggal yang tertera pada laporan auditor independen. Penelitian ini menguji kembali faktor-faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi masa audit delay pada perusahaan publik yang terdapat di BEI tahun 2014 hingga 2018. Variabel independen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah keberadaan komite tata kelola, ukuran komite audit, reputasi KAP, kompleksitas perusahaan, laba dan opini audit. Penentuan sampel menggunakan metode purposive sampling dengan jumlah sampel akhir yang digunakan yaitu 1866 perusahaan. Analisis menggunakan regresi logistik. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa keberadaan komite tata kelola, reputasi KAP, dan laba berpengaruh negatif terhadap audit delay, dan kompleksitas perusahaan berpengaruh positif terhadap audit delay, sedangkan ukuran komite audit tidak berpengaruh terhadap audit delay.
ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji inefisiensi investasi pasca diterbitkannya aturan Bapepam-LK tahun 2003 yang mengharuskan direksi membuat pernyataan tertulis bahwa sistem pengendalian internal perusahaan merupakan tanggung jawab mereka. Hasil analisis regresi menunjukkan bahwa pasca terbitnya aturan tentang pengendalian internal kualitas laporan keuangan berhubungan negatif signifikan terhadap inefisiensi investasi. Hasil regresi menunjukkan bahwa tingkat under investment dan over investment perusahaan yang mengalami keterbatasan keuangan dan yang tidak mengalami keterbatasan keuangan tidak berbeda. Secara keseluruhan hasil-hasil temuan di atas memberi isyarat bahwa laporan keuangan berperan penting dalam menurunkan inefisiensi investasi yang bersumber dari over investment dan keterbatasan keuangan tidak berpengaruh terhadap inefisiensi investasi.Kata kunci: Inefisiensi investasi, under/over investment, pengendalian internal, laporan keuangan. ABSTRACT Previous studies have shown that a weak internal control may lead to increased moral hazard and adverse selection and may in turn lead to increased investment inefficiency. This study examine investment efficiency of firms listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange after the release of Bapepam-LK regulation on internal control in 2003. Regression analysis showed that after the issuance of the regulation on internal control, financial reporting quality is
Conceptually, a company should invest in projects that will generate a positive Net Present Value (NPV). However, information asymmetry can lead to wrong investment decisions, namely investing in projects with a negative NPV and rejecting projects that produce a positive NPV. The wrong investment decision causes under (over) investment. This study aims to reexamine the effect of debt maturity, tangibility, foreign ownership, frequency of audit committee meetings, and company age on the company's investment efficiency. This study uses secondary data in the form of financial statements and annual reports of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2012-2016. Number of samples used in this study are 289 companies. The results of the regression analysis show that debt maturity, tangibility have a positive effect on investment efficiency. Foreign ownership, company age, institutional ownership and managerial ownership negatively affect investment efficiency. Meanwhile, the frequency of meetings of the audit committee and the independent board of commissioners did not affect the investment efficiency. Abstrak Secara konseptual, perusahaan seharusnya melakukan investasi pada proyek yang akan menghasilkan Net Present Value (NPV) positif. Namun, asimetri informasi dapat menyebabkan putusan investasi yang keliru yaitu berinvestasi pada proyek dengan NPV negatif dan menolak proyek yang menghasilkan NPV positif. Keputusan investasi yang keliru menyebabkan terjadinya under (over) investment. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji kembali pengaruh maturitas utang, tangibilitas, kepemilikan asing, frekuensi pertemuan komite audit, dan umur perusahaan terhadap Efisiensi Investasi Perusahaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder yang berupa laporan keuangan dan laporan tahunan perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2012-2016. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 289 perusahaan. Hasil analisis reegresi menunjukkan bahwa maturitas utang, tangibilitas berpengaruh positif terhadap efisiensi investasi. Kepemilikan asing, umur perusahaan, kepemilikan institusional dan kepemilikan manajerial berpengaruh negatif terhadap efisiensi investasi. Sementara, frekuensi pertemuan komite audit dan dewan komisaris independen tidak berpengaruh terhadap efisiensi investasi.
This study examines the role of specialist auditors in enhancing the quality of financial statements by taking into account industry complexity. The test of hypotheses are conducted in two steps. The first step is to provide evidence that earnings quality, measured by earnings persistent, of firms operating in the complex and non-complex industry are different. The second step is to compare the absolute abnormal accruals of companies engaged in the complex industry with those from non-complex industry audited by non-specialist and specialists auditors. Results show: 1) earnings persistence of firms in complex industries are lower than those in non-complex industries. 2) absolute abnormal accruals of firms operating in complex industries are higher than those in non-complex industries regardless industry specialization. Overall, the results suggest that auditor industry expertise does not play a significant role in improving the quality of audited earnings in complex business environment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.