Meta-analysis and comparative systematic review confirm that FNAC is highly effective in the diagnosis of head and neck masses, with some limitations.

Objective The rapid worldwide rise in incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has generated studies confirming this disease as an entity distinct from traditional OPSCC. Based on pathology, surgical studies have revealed prognosticators specific to HPV-positive OPSCC. The current AJCC/UICC staging and pathologic nodal (pN)-classification do not differentiate for survival, demonstrating the need for new, HPV-specific OPSCC staging. The objective of this study was to define a pathologic staging system specific to HPV-positive OPSCC. Methods Data were assembled from a surgically-managed, p16-positive OPSCC cohort (any T, any N, M0) of 704 patients from five cancer centers. Analysis was performed for a) the AJCC/UICC pathologic staging, b) newly published clinical staging for non-surgically managed HPV-positive OPSCC and c), a novel, pathology-based, “HPVpath” staging system that combines features of the primary tumor and nodal metastases. Results A combination of AJCC/UICC pT-classification and pathology-confirmed metastatic node count (<4 versus ≥5) yielded three groups, stages I (pT1-T2, ≤ 4 nodes), II (pT1-T2, ≥ 5 nodes; pT3-T4, ≤ 4 nodes), and III (pT3-T4, ≥ 5 nodes), with incrementally worse prognosis (Kaplan-Meier overall survival of 90%, 84% and 48% respectively). Existing AJCC/UICC pathologic staging lacked prognostic definition. Newly published HPV-specific clinical stagings from non-surgically managed patients, although prognostic, showed lower precision for this surgically managed cohort. Conclusions Three loco-regional “HPVpath” stages are identifiable for HPV-positive OPSCC, based on a combination of AJCC/UICC primary tumor pT-classification and metastatic node count. A workable, pathologic staging system is feasible to guide prognosis and adjuvant therapy decisions in surgically-managed HPV-positive OPSCC.

Objectives: To summarize existing evidence about whether the presence of mutant or upregulated p53 is a prognostic factor for patients presenting with squamous cell carcinoma arising from the larynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or oral cavity.Method: Relevant articles were identified using strict criteria for systematic searches. Associations between mutant or upregulated p53 versus wild-type or low/undetectable p53 in relation to overall survival and DFS were summarized by extracting or deriving hazard ratio (HR) estimates. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to account for between-study heterogeneity and to summarize the effect of p53 across studies.Results: The meta-analyses gave a statistically significant pooled HR for overall survival in oral cavity [pooled HR, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, (95% CI), 1.03-2.11], and for disease-free survival in oral cavity (pooled HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.12-1.93) and in oropharynx (pooled HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.27-0.73). Despite attempts to limit it, between-study heterogeneity was large in the majority of meta-analyses and the prognostic value of p53 was generally inconsistent and inconclusive across studies.Conclusion: The meta-analysis results highlight that current evidence about the prognostic value of p53 in patients with squamous cell carcinaoma of the head and neck is inconclusive. Large heterogeneity exists across studies in study-level and patient-level characteristics, making it difficult to ascertain a clear picture. Future studies are required in which p53 expression is investigated in a more standardized and biologically informative manner. In particular, prospectively planned individual patient data meta-analyses are needed to establish the prognostic importance of p53 for specific subgroups of patients undergoing specific treatments.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(2); 574-87. ©2010 AACR.

Voice & speech impairment is prevalent in >70% of oropharyngeal cancer patients. There is moderate correlation between UWQOL speech domain and speech intelligibility assessment & voice tools making it a quick and easy screening instrument. The main clinical correlates associated with adverse patient and observer rated speech and voice outcomes were tumour stage, RT and free-flap reconstruction.