BackgroundArray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is currently the most powerful method for detecting chromosomal alterations in pre and postnatal clinical cases. In this study, we developed a BAC based array CGH analysis platform for detecting whole genome DNA copy number changes including specific micro deletion and duplication chromosomal disorders. Additionally, we report our experience with the clinical implementation of our array CGH analysis platform. Array CGH was performed on 5080 pre and postnatal clinical samples from patients referred with a variety of clinical phenotypes.ResultsA total of 4073 prenatal cases (4033 amniotic fluid and 40 chorionic villi specimens) and 1007 postnatal cases (407 peripheral blood and 600 cord blood) were studied with complete concordance between array CGH, karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Among 75 positive prenatal cases with DNA copy number variations, 60 had an aneuploidy, seven had a deletion, and eight had a duplication. Among 39 positive postnatal cases samples, five had an aneuploidy, 23 had a deletion, and 11 had a duplication.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the utility of using our newly developed whole-genome array CGH as first-tier test in 5080 pre and postnatal cases. Array CGH has increased the ability to detect segmental deletion and duplication in patients with variable clinical features and is becoming a more powerful tool in pre and postnatal diagnostics.
IMPORTANCE Despite the increased use of rituximab therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), the overall efficacy and safety of long-term rituximab treatment in a large group of patients is uncertain. Furthermore, the identification of a predictor of rituximab response is an important issue for assessing the individual risk-benefit of therapy and making treatment decisions.OBJECTIVE To assess the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment in patients with NMOSD and the influence of fragment c gamma receptor 3A (FCGR3A) polymorphisms on rituximab response. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA retrospective review of 100 patients with relapsing NMOSD treated with rituximab for at least 6 months, from February 1, 2006, to January 31, 2015, at the institutional referral center. After induction therapy, a single infusion of rituximab (375 mg/m 2 ) as maintenance therapy was administered whenever a reemergence of CD27 + memory B cells among peripheral blood mononuclear cells occurred. Using an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction-based method, the gene polymorphisms FCGR3A-V158F were assessed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary end point was annualized relapse rate; disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale score), safety of rituximab treatment, event of insufficient memory B-cell depletion following rituximab, and time to retreatment of rituximab were secondary end points.RESULTS By January 31, 2015, a total of 100 patients received repeated rituximab treatment during a median of 67 months. Of these patients, 41 had more than 5 years' follow-up and 24 had more than 7 years' follow-up. The annualized relapse rate was reduced significantly by 96% (mean [SD] annualized relapse rate of prerituximab vs postrituximab, 2.4 [2.0] vs 0.1 [0.6]) and disability improved or stabilized in 96% of patients. Rates of adverse events were generally stable. The FCGR3A-F allele was associated with a risk of relapse while receiving rituximab treatment (additive model, P < .05; recessive model, P = .04; maximum, P = .03) and insufficient memory B-cell depletion (additive model, P = .03; recessive model, P = .03; maximum, P = .03).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Repeated rituximab treatment for NMOSD was observed in an increasing number of patients and increasing duration of exposure and maintained good efficacy and a safety profile consistent with previous reports. The finding of a relationship between FCGR3A genetic polymorphisms and rituximab response suggests the importance of individualized rituximab treatment strategies in NMOSD.
Since vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) was first reported in Japan in 1997, there has been great concern that heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hetero-VISA) is the putative precursor of VISA. To investigate the prevalence, clinical significance, and molecular epidemiology of S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, all consecutive isolates of S. aureus isolated from clinical specimens from December 1998 to August 1999 at Asan Medical Center were screened for VISA and hetero-VISA by using brain heart infusion agar containing 4 g of vancomycin/ml. Screen-positive isolates were confirmed by susceptibility testing and population analysis of subpopulations with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. The isolates confirmed as hetero-VISA were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Medical records were reviewed to evaluate the clinical significance and risk factors for the acquisition of hetero-VISA. Of the 4,483 isolates that were tested, 53 were screen positive; no VISA was detected, but 24 isolates (0.54%) from 22 patients were hetero-VISA. All but two strains appeared to be clones of the Korean VISA strain, AMC11094, in the PFGE analysis. A total of 18 patients were in intensive care units, and 16 underwent major surgeries during the same admission. Only 10 of the 22 patients had previous methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections and 11 had previous vancomycin or teicoplanin therapy. Only 7 of the 22 patients from whom hetero-VISA strains were isolated were infected, and the remaining 15 patients were colonized. All seven infected patients were successfully treated with vancomycin. These results suggest that hetero-VISA can be treated with vancomycin, but the spread of hetero-VISA clonal to VISA is of concern, since many believe that VISA can arise from hetero-VISA, although this phenomenon was not observed in this study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.