Various electrical stimulation waveforms have been used to enhance wound healing, with little consideration for potential differences in their physiologic effect. The present study evaluated the effect of stimulation waveform and electrode placement on wound healing. Eighty patients with spinal cord injury and one or more pressure ulcers were treated. A total of 185 ulcers received 45 minutes of stimulation daily. Each ulcer was subjected to one of four treatment protocols: asymmetric biphasic waveform, symmetric biphasic waveform, microcurrent stim-ulation, or a sham control protocol. Electrodes were placed outside the wounds, over intact skin and surrounding the area of the ulcer. Data were categorized by ulcers which healed during the protocol and those which did not. Analysis of the "good response" ulcers (n = 104) showed significantly better healing rates for those receiving stimulation with the asymmetric biphasic waveform, compared with the control and microcurrent groups. Mean healing rates from the present study were similar to previously reported measures. The waveforms studied possessed minimal polar capabilities, and the electrodes were placed outside the wound. These data show that electrical stimulation clearly enhanced healing of pressure ulcers in a significant number of individuals with spinal cord injury; the physiologic implications of these findings relative to the mechanism(s) by which electrical stimulation enhances wound healing are discussed. However, extrapolation of these results to patients with other types of wounds must await further study.
Pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury represent a challenging problem for patients, their caregivers, and their physicians. They often lead to recurrent hospitalizations, multiple surgeries, and potentially devastating complications. They present a significant cost to the healthcare system, they require a multidisciplinary team approach to manage well, and outcomes directly depend on patients' education, prevention, and compliance with conservative and surgical protocols. With so many factors involved in the successful treatment of pressure ulcers, an update on their comprehensive management in spinal cord injury is warranted. Current concepts of local wound care, surgical options, as well as future trends from the latest wound healing research are reviewed to aid medical professionals in treating patients with this difficult problem.
Principles pertaining to the relationship between in-context lifestyle and pressure ulcer risk underscore previous quantitative findings, but also lead to new understandings of how risk unfolds in everyday life situations. Pressure ulcer prevention for community-dwelling adults with SCI can potentially be enhanced by incorporating principles, such as the decay of prevention behaviors or lifestyle trade-off, that highlight special patterns indicative of elevated risk. The identified principles can be used to theoretically drive future research or to guide innovative lifestyle-focused intervention approaches. Public policies that promote short-term preventive interventions at critical junctures throughout a person's life should be considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.