Context: There has been renewed interest in anti-Mü llerian hormone (AMH) because of its role in the ovary. Data on its actions are sparse, but it appears to inhibit follicle growth. Interestingly, serum AMH is two to three times higher in women with polycystic ovary (PCO) syndrome than women with normal ovaries. Objective:We examined the production of AMH by cells from a range of follicle sizes from normal ovaries and compared this with production by ovulatory and anovulatory (anov) PCOs.Design: Granulosa cells (GCs) and theca and follicular fluid (ff) were isolated from intact follicles. Cells were cultured for 48 h Ϯ FSH or LH, and AMH was measured in ff and cell-conditioned media (CM).Results: AMH levels in ff and GC-CM ranged from 42 to 2240 and 0.025 to 1.7 ng/ml, respectively, and were low or undetectable in ff and GC-CM from follicles greater than 9 mm, luteinized cells, and theca and stroma. The mean level of AMH was four times higher in GC-CM from ovulatory PCOs [mean (range) 1.56 (0.025-7)] and 75 times higher from anovPCO [21.4 (17.2-43 ng/ml)] than normal ovaries [0.37 (0.025-1.7)]. Neither LH nor FSH had an effect on AMH production by GCs from normal ovaries, but in cells from PCOs, FSH significantly decreased AMH, and in contrast, LH increased AMH. Conclusions:The reduction of AMH in follicles greater than 9 mm from normal ovaries appears to be an important requirement for the selection of the dominant follicle. AMH production per GC was 75 times higher in anovPCOs, compared with normal ovaries. This increase in AMH may contribute to failure of follicle growth and ovulation seen in polycystic ovary syndrome.

The majority of breast cancers are oestrogen dependent and in postmenopausal women the supply of oestrogens in breast tissue is derived from the peripheral conversion of circulating androgens. There is, however, a paradox concerning the epidemiology of breast cancer and the dietary intake of phytoestrogens that bind weakly to oestrogen receptors and initiate oestrogendependent transcription. In Eastern countries, such as Japan, the incidence of breast cancer is approximately one-third that of Western countries whilst their high dietary intake of phytoestrogens, mainly in the form of soy products, can produce circulating levels of phytoestrogens that are known experimentally to have oestrogenic effects. Indeed, their weak oestrogenicity has been used to advantage by herbalist medicine to promote soy products as a natural alternative to conventional hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Such usage could increase in light of recent evidence that long-term HRT usage may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer with a consequent reduction in prescription rates. So, are phytoestrogens safe as a natural alternative to HRT and could they be promoters or protectors of breast cancer? If they are promoters, then we must assume that it is due to their oestrogenic effect. If they are protectors, then other actions of phytoestrogens, including their ability to inhibit enzymes that are responsible for converting androgens and weak oestrogens into oestradiol, must be considered. This paper addresses these questions by reviewing the actions of phytoestrogens on oestrogen receptors and key enzymes that convert androgens to oestrogens in relation to the growth of breast cancer cells. In addition, it compares the experimental and epidemiological evidence pertinent to the potential beneficial or harmful effects of phytoestrogens in relation to the incidence/progression of breast cancer and their efficacy as natural alternatives to conventional HRT.

No abstract

This is the first study to identify the expression of AR in human transitional follicles. Results suggest a role for androgens in promoting early follicle growth and challenging the hypothesis that AMH exerts a direct, inhibitory effect on follicles at this stage.

No abstract