Key parameters that influence the specific energy of electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) are the double-layer capacitance and the operating potential of the cell. The operating potential of the cell is generally limited by the electrochemical window of the electrolyte solution, that is, the range of applied voltages within which the electrolyte or solvent is not reduced or oxidized. Ionic liquids are of interest as electrolytes for EDLCs because they offer relatively wide potential windows. Here, we provide a systematic study of the influence of the physical properties of ionic liquid electrolytes on the electrochemical stability and electrochemical performance (double-layer capacitance, specific energy) of EDLCs that employ a mesoporous carbon model electrode with uniform, highly interconnected mesopores (3DOm carbon). Several ionic liquids with structurally diverse anions (tetrafluoroborate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, trifluoromethanesulfonimide) and cations (imidazolium, ammonium, pyridinium, piperidinium, and pyrrolidinium) were investigated. We show that the cation size has a significant effect on the electrolyte viscosity and conductivity, as well as the capacitance of EDLCs. Imidazolium- and pyridinium-based ionic liquids provide the highest cell capacitance, and ammonium-based ionic liquids offer potential windows much larger than imidazolium and pyridinium ionic liquids. Increasing the chain length of the alkyl substituents in 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonimide does not widen the potential window of the ionic liquid. We identified the ionic liquids that maximize the specific energies of EDLCs through the combined effects of their potential windows and the double-layer capacitance. The highest specific energies are obtained with ionic liquid electrolytes that possess moderate electrochemical stability, small ionic volumes, low viscosity, and hence high conductivity, the best performing ionic liquid tested being 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide.

Experimental solvation free energies are nowadays commonly included as target properties in the validation and sometimes even in the calibration of condensed-phase force fields. However, this is often done in a nonsystematic fashion, by considering available solvation free energies involving an arbitrary collection of solutes in a limited set of solvents (e.g., water, octanol, chloroform, cyclohexane, or hexane). Here, this approach is made more systematic by introducing the concept of cross-solvation free energies Δ s G A:B ⊖ for a set of N molecules that are all in the liquid state under ambient conditions, namely the matrix of N 2 entries for Δ s G A:B ⊖ considering each of the N molecules either as a solute (A) or as a solvent (B). Relying on available experimental literature followed by careful data curation, a complete Δ s G A:B ⊖ matrix of 625 entries is constructed for 25 molecules with one to seven carbon atoms representative for alkanes, chloroalkanes, ethers, ketones, esters, alcohols, amines, and amides. This matrix is then used to compare the relative accuracies of four popular condensed-phase force fields: GROMOS-2016H66, OPLS-AA, AMBER-GAFF, and CHARMM-CGenFF. In broad terms, and in spite of very different force-field functional-form choices and parametrization strategies, the four force fields are found to perform similarly well. Relative to the experimental values, the root-mean-square errors range between 2.9 and 4.0 kJ·mol–1 (lowest value of 2.9 for GROMOS and OPLS), and the average errors range between −0.8 and +1.0 kJ·mol–1 (lowest magnitude of 0.2 for AMBER and CHARMM). These differences are statistically significant but not very pronounced, especially considering the influence of outliers, some of which possibly caused by inaccurate experimental data.

We present a set of Lennard-Jones parameters for classical, all-atom models of acetate and various alkylated and non-alkylated forms of sulfate, sulfonate and phosphate ions, optimized to reproduce their interactions with water and with the physiologically relevant sodium, ammonium and methylammonium cations. The parameters are internally consistent and are fully compatible with the Generalized Amber Force Field (GAFF), the AMBER force field for proteins, the accompanying TIP3P water model and the sodium model of Joung and Cheatham. The parameters were developed primarily relying on experimental information -hydration free energies and solution activity derivatives at 0.5 m concentration -with ab initio, gas phase calculations being used for the cases where experimental information is missing. The ab initio parameterization scheme presented here is distinct from other approaches because it explicitly connects gas phase binding energies to intermolecular interactions in solution. We demonstrate that the original GAFF/AMBER parameters often overestimate anion-cation interactions, leading to an excessive number of contact ion pairs in solutions of carboxylate ions, and to aggregation in solutions of divalent ions. GAFF/AMBER parameters lead to excessive numbers of salt bridges in proteins and of contact ion pairs between sodium and acidic protein groups, issues that are resolved by using the optimized parameters presented here.

The secondary kinetic isotope effects for the hydride transfer reactions from aliphatic alcohols to two carbocations (NAD(+) models) in acetonitrile were determined. The results suggest that the hydride transfer takes place by tunneling and that the rehybridizations of both donor and acceptor carbons lag behind the H-tunneling. This is quite contrary to the observations in alcohol dehydrogenases where the importance of enzyme motions in catalysis is manifested.