Background Globally the burden of Obstructive Lung Diseases (OLD) is growing, however its effect on urban poor populations with the high prevalence of tobacco dependence is virtually unknown. The purpose of this project is to estimate the prevalence and burden of OLD in the urban, low-income populations of Ottawa, Canada. Methods The study presented in this paper was part of the PROMPT (Management and Point-of-Care for Tobacco Dependence) project; a prospective cohort study in a community-based setting (n = 80) with meaningful Patient Engagement from design to dissemination. Spirometry data, standardized questionnaires and semi-structured interviews from PROMPT were interpreted to understand the lung function, disease burden and social determinants (respectively) in this population. Results The prevalence of OLD among those who completed spirometry (N = 64) was 45–59%. Generic and disease-specific quality of life was generally poor in all PROMPT participants, even those without OLD, highlighting the higher disease burden this vulnerable population faces. Quality of life was impacted by two major themes, including i) socioeconomic status and stress and ii) social networks and related experiences of trauma. Conclusion The prevalence and disease burden of OLD is significantly higher in Ottawa’s urban poor population than what is observed in the general Canadian population who smoke, suggesting an etiological role of the social determinants of health. This urges the need for comprehensive care programs addressing up-stream factors leading to OLDs, including poor access and utilization of preventive healthcare addressing the social determinants of health. Trial registration ClinicalTrails.gov - NCT03626064, Retrospective registered: August 2018.

IntroductionThe high cost of many healthy foods poses a challenge to maintaining optimal blood glucose levels for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are experiencing food insecurity, leading to diabetes complications and excess acute care usage and costs. Healthy food prescription programmes may reduce food insecurity and support patients to improve their diet quality, prevent diabetes complications and avoid acute care use. We will use a type 2 hybrid-effectiveness design to examine the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM) of a healthy food prescription incentive programme for adults experiencing food insecurity and persistent hyperglycaemia. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) will investigate programme effectiveness via impact on glycosylated haemoglobin (primary outcome), food insecurity, diet quality and other clinical and patient-reported outcomes. A modelling study will estimate longer-term programme effectiveness in reducing diabetes-related complications, resource use and costs. An implementation study will examine all RE-AIM domains to understand determinants of effective implementation and reasons behind programme successes and failures.Methods and analysis594 adults who are experiencing food insecurity and persistent hyperglycaemia will be randomised to a healthy food prescription incentive (n=297) or a healthy food prescription comparison group (n=297). Both groups will receive a healthy food prescription. The incentive group will additionally receive a weekly incentive (CDN$10.50/household member) to purchase healthy foods in supermarkets for 6 months. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and follow-up (6 months) in the RCT and analysed using mixed-effects regression. Longer-term outcomes will be modelled using the UK Prospective Diabetes Study outcomes simulation model-2. Implementation processes and outcomes will be continuously measured via quantitative and qualitative data.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from the University of Calgary and the University of Alberta. Findings will be disseminated through reports, lay summaries, policy briefs, academic publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberNCT04725630.Protocol versionVersion 1.1; February 2022

BackgroundThere remains a disproportionally high tobacco smoking rate in low-income populations. Multicomponent tobacco dependence interventions in theory are effective. However, which intervention components are necessary to include for low socioeconomic status (SES) populations is still unknown.ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of multicomponent tobacco dependence interventions for low SES and create a checklist tool examining multicomponent interventions.MethodsEMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published with the primary outcome of tobacco smoking cessation measured at 6 months or post intervention. RCTs that evaluated tobacco dependence management interventions (for reduction or cessation) in low SES (experience of housing insecurity, poverty, low income, unemployment, mental health challenges, illicit substance use and/or food insecurity) were included. Two authors independently abstracted data. Random effects meta-analysis and post hoc sensitivity analysis were performed.ResultsOf the 33 included studies, the number of intervention components ranged from 1 to 6, with smoking quit rates varying between 1% and 36.6%. Meta-analysis revealed that both the 6-month and 12-month outcome timepoints, multicomponent interventions were successful in achieving higher smoking quit rates than the control (OR 1.64, 95% Cl 1.41 to 1.91; OR 1.74, 95% Cl 1.30 to 2.33). Evidence of low heterogeneity in the effect size was observed at 6-month (I2=26%) and moderate heterogeneity at 12-month (I2=56%) outcomes.ConclusionMulticomponent tobacco dependence interventions should focus on inclusion of social support, frequency and duration of components. Employing community-based participatory-action research approach is essential to addressing underlying psychosocioeconomic-structural factors, in addition to the proven combination pharmacotherapies.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017076650.

Rationale Oscillometry is an emerging technique that offers some advantages over spirometry as it does not require forced exhalation and may detect early changes in respiratory pathology. Obstructive lung disease disproportionately impacts people experiencing homelessness with a high symptoms burden, yet oscillometry is not studied in this population. Objectives To assess lung disease and symptom burden using oscillometry in people experiencing homelessness or at-risk of homelessness using a community-based participatory action research approach (The Bridge Model™). Methods Of 80 recruited, 55 completed baseline oscillometry, 64 completed spirometry, and all completed patient-reported outcomes with demographics, health, and respiratory symptom related questionnaires in the Participatory Research in Ottawa: Management and Point-of-Care for Tobacco Dependence project. Using a two-tail t-test, we compared mean oscillometry values for airway resistance (R5–20), reactance area under the curve (Ax) and reactance at 5 Hz (X5) amongst individuals with fixed-ratio method (FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.70) and LLN (FEV1/FVC ratio ≤ LLN) spirometry diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We compared mean oscillometry parameters based on participants’ COPD assessment test (CAT) scores using ANOVA test. Results There was no significant difference between the pre- and post- bronchodilator values of R5–20 and Ax for the fixed ratio method (p = 0.63 and 0.43) and the LLN method (p = 0.45 and 0.36). There was a significant difference in all three of the oscillometry parameters, R5–20, Ax and X5, based on CAT score (p = 0.009, 0.007 and 0.05, respectively). There was a significant difference in R5–20 and Ax based on the presence of phlegm (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively) and the presence of wheeze (p = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). Oscillometry data did not correlate with spirometry data, but it was associated with CAT scores and correlated with the presence of self-reported symptoms of phlegm and wheeze in this population. Conclusions Oscillometry is associated with respiratory symptom burden and highlights the need for future studies to generate more robust data regarding the use of oscillometry in systematically disadvantaged populations where disease burden is disproportionately higher than the general population. TrialRegistration: ClinicalTrails.gov—NCT03626064, Retrospective registered: August 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03626064

Background: The high cost of many healthy foods poses a significant challenge to the maintenance of optimal blood glucose levels for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who are experiencing food insecurity, leading to diabetes complications and excess acute care usage and costs. Subsidized healthy food prescription programs may help to reduce food insecurity by financially supporting patients to improve their diet quality, prevent diabetes complications and avoid acute care use. This study will use a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to examine the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM) of a subsidized healthy food prescription program for adults who are experiencing food insecurity and persistent hyperglycemia. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will investigate program effectiveness via impact on blood glucose levels (primary outcome), food insecurity, diet quality and other clinical and patient-reported outcomes. A modelling study will estimate longer-term program effectiveness in reducing diabetes-related complications, resource use and costs. An implementation study will examine all RE-AIM domains, including reasons behind program successes and failures, fidelity, mechanisms of impact, contextual determinants of effective implementation and sustainability. Methods: 404 adults who are experiencing food insecurity and persistent hyperglycemia, including adults who identify as Indigenous, will be randomized to a subsidized healthy food prescription intervention (n=202) or a healthy food prescription comparison group (n=202). Both groups will receive a healthy food prescription. The intervention group will additionally receive $1.50/day/household member to purchase healthy foods in supermarkets for 6 months. The implementation process will follow the Quality Implementation Framework. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and follow-up (6 months) in the RCT and analyzed using mixed-effects linear and multinomial logistic/ordinal regression models. Longer-term outcomes will be modelled using the validated UK Prospective Diabetes Study outcomes simulation model-2. Implementation processes and outcomes will be continuously measured via quantitative and qualitative data and analyzed using descriptive statistics and theory-informed directed content analysis, respectively. Discussion: This research will provide a comprehensive body of data with high internal and external validity to assist policymakers and practitioners to effectively and rapidly translate the evidence generated into programs and policies to support patients with T2DM who are experiencing food insecurity. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04725630 (January 25, 2021; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04725630?term=Subsidized+Healthy+Food+Prescription+Program&cond=Diabetes+Mellitus%2C+Type+2&draw=2&rank=1).