ABSTRACT. Different forms of p210 are produced by alternative splicing, namely b2a2 and b3a2. There have been many contrasting data establishing a relationship between the two Bcr/Abl transcripts and platelet counts and also response to treatment. However, the data published to date have been on a small group of patients. The aim of the present study was to determine whether there was any difference between clinical and hematological parameters at diagnosis between the two Bcr/Abl fusion transcripts in our population, and whether the two transcripts responded differently or similarly to imatinib treatment. RT-PCR was performed in 202 cases for detection of Bcr/Abl transcripts in newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia cases in one year. The two transcripts were compared and correlated with clinical, hematological and FISH data and with response to treatment. A total of 138 cases were of b3a2 and 64 were of b2a2 transcript. There was no correlation between the hemato- logical parameters and the type of transcript. There was a significant association of blast crisis with b2a2, especially with myeloid blast crisis. When compared to FISH results, 10% of b3a2 were found to have a significant association with 5'Abl deletion as compared to 3% of b2a2. On analyzing the therapeutic response, we did not find any difference between the two transcripts. In conclusion, our findings confirm that the b3a2 type transcript is not significantly associated with thrombocytosis, that the short transcript, b2a2, occurs with acute phase, i.e., blast crisis, and that there is no difference in treatment response between the two transcripts. However, further studies are required to understand the molecular pathways involved in the Bcr/Abl mechanism.

We evaluated the diagnostic utility of flow cytometry immunophenotyping in bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood, in the assessment of mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (MBNHL). We analyzed 356 cases of MBNHL received for immunophenotyping over a 4 year period. All cases were reviewed, correlated with biopsy specimen (lymph node and splenectomy). Discrepant cases were re-evaluated. Common subtypes included chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (243 cases, 68.5%), follicular lymphoma (30 cases, 8.5%), mantle cell lymphoma (20 cases, 5.5%), splenic marginal zone lymphoma (18 cases, 5%), hairy cell leukemia (18 cases, 5%). CD5+/CD23+ had a high positive predictive value (PPV) for diagnosing CLL whereas CD5+/CD23- had a high negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosing mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). Limited panel of 9 antibodies mainly CD19, CD5, CD23, CD10, FMC7, kappa, lambda, CD3 and CD20 help diagnose more than 92% of cases of MBNHL. Minimal diagnostic panels become important in countries with limited resources.

BACKGROUND:We present a clinico-hematological profile and treatment outcome of Biphenotypic Acute Leukemia (BAL). AIM: Study incidence and subtypes of BAL, correlate with age, morphology, and cytogenetic findings and correlate the clinico-hematological data with the treatment response. St Jude's and the EGIL's criteria have been compared for their diagnostic and clinical relevance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Diagnosis was based on WHO classification, including clinical details, morphology, cytochemistry, immunophenotyping, and molecular genetics. We included those cases, which fulfilled the European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Acute Leukemia's (EGIL's) scoring system criteria for the diagnosis of BAL, as per recommendation of the WHO classification. RESULTS: There were 32 patients diagnosed with BAL, based on EGIL's criteria. Incidence of BAL was 1.2%. B-Myeloid (14 cases) followed by T-Myeloid BAL (13 cases) were the commonest subtypes. Polymorphous population of blasts (16 cases) was commonly associated with T-Myeloid BAL (10 cases). BCR ABL fusion positivity was a common cytogenetic abnormality (seven cases). Fifteen patients received chemotherapy; eight achieved complete remission (CR) at the end of the induction period. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric BAL and T-B lymphoid BAL have a better prognosis. A comprehensive panel of reagents is required, including cytoplasmic markers; to diagnose BAL. St Jude's criteria is a simple, easy, and cost-effective method to diagnose BAL. The outcome-related prognostic factors include age, HLA-DR, CD34 negativity, and subtype of BAL. BCR-ABL expression is an important prognostic factor, as these cases will be labeled as Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast crisis with biphenotypic expression and treated accordingly.

ABStRACt. Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by a reciprocal translocation, t(15;17)(q22;q11-21), resulting in the fusion of the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) and retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) genes. Using conventional cytogenetic methods, these translocations are normally detected in about 70-90% of patients; most negative results are due to technical problems or cryptic variants. These masked PML/RARα fusions can be identified by molecular analyses, such as reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Approximately 5 to 10% of all APL cases reported do not show PML/RARα fusion transcripts, even with dual-colored FISH. We report three of 40 diagnosed APL cases that showed morphological, cytochemical, and immunophenotypic features of hypergranular APL, but did not show a PML/RARα fusion signal or any of its variants, on FISH. All cases were identified by RT-PCR, which was further confirmed by cDNA sequencing. Conventional karyotyping showed other clonal aberrations in these cases, but failed to show t(15;17) or any other variants or complex translocations.

Both RT-PCR and FISH are important for the diagnosis of APL cases, as both techniques complement each other in the absence or failure of any one of them. However, RT-PCR is more sensitive than FISH for the detection of minimal residual disease in the long-term monitoring of these patients. The present study shows that the predictive value of relapse is more associated with minimal residual disease (MRD) results by RT-PCR than that by FISH.