Neutrophil bactericidal activity was assessed in patients with type 1 (n = 45) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 68) and non-diabetic control subjects (n = 40) by measurement of whole blood chemiluminescence. Though chemiluminescence values tended to be highest in the non-diabetic subjects these differences were not statistically significant (mean +/- SD) (2.73 +/- 1.65 mV (controls), 2.33 +/- 1.41 mV (Type 1 diabetes) and 2.38 +/- 1.12 mv (Type 2 diabetes), F = 1.12, p = 0.33). Significant negative correlations were evident, however, in patients with both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes between chemiluminescence and glycated haemoglobin (rs = -0.35, p = 0.005 (Type 1), rs = -0.45, p = 0.002 (Type 2), fructosamine (rs = -0.36, p = 0.003 (Type 1), r = -0.42, p = 0.004 (Type 2)), and random blood glucose (rs 0 -0.25, p = 0.04 (Type 1), rs = -0.48, p = 0.001 (Type 2)). Changes in whole blood chemiluminescence in a further group of 10 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus commenced on insulin therapy were followed for 21 days. Serum fructosamine concentrations fell significantly over this time (524 +/- 58 mumol l-1 to 405 +/- 47 mumol l-1, p < 0.001), however, although chemiluminescence values tended to rise these changes were not statistically significant (1.01 +/- 0.38 mV to 1.60 +/- 0.91 mV, S = 4.24, df = 5, p = 0.52). These results suggested that impaired neutrophil bactericidal function is associated with poor blood glucose control. While it is likely that neutrophil bactericidal function will improve as blood glucose control improves, further studies are required both to confirm this and to demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of clinical bacterial infection.

No abstract

Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia is said to be an extremely rare condition but is clinically important because it can be confused with primary hyperparathyroidism. The biochemical features of the two conditions are similar, but the former is benign while the latter can have serious clinical consequences with patients occasionally proceeding to parathyroidectomy. It is therefore important to differentiate accurately between the two. With this in mind it would be useful to know the prevalence of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia when considering the differential diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism. However, as far as we are aware, no estimate of the prevalence of this condition can be found in the literature. We describe how an estimate was made of the prevalence of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia in the west of Scotland. We estimate the prevalence to be 1 in 78,000 at least.

Measurement of bone density and turnover was assessed in 20 premenopausal females with Type 1 diabetes mellitus and 27 age-sex-matched controls. Measurement was made of spinal (L2-4) and neck of femur bone density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. L2-4 density was significantly higher in the diabetic patients compared with controls (1.224 +/- 0.021 g cm-2 vs. 1.161 +/- 0.020 g cm-2: p = 0.016). No significant difference was noted between the groups in neck of femur density. Measurement of bone formation was assessed by serum alkaline phosphatase and bone resorption by fasting urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio. Alkaline phosphatase was significantly higher in the diabetic patients (185 +/- 16 Ul-1 vs 135 +/- 10 Ul-1: p < 0.01) as was hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio (0.028 +/- 0.003 vs 0.017 +/- 0.002: p = 0.002). No significant correlation was found between L2-4 density and glycated haemoglobin, duration of diabetes or daily dose of insulin taken. These data suggest that osteopenia is not associated with Type 1 diabetes mellitus; however these patients do have evidence of increased bone turnover and may therefore be at risk of osteoporosis in later life, particularly after the menopause.