Rhinoresistometry and acoustic rhinometry complement each other. The combination of the two methods provides insight into the functional changes during the nasal cycle and into nasal physiology in general. The authors therefore advocate a combination of the two methods for functional evaluation of the nasal airway.

Background: Septal perforation is a common clinical problem in rhinology. Affected patients suffer from a dry nose, crusts as well as recurrent epistaxis and sometimes an inspiratory whistle. The aim of this study was to investigate the underlying flow dynamic mechanisms. Methods: The physical flow effects of such pathologies were examined in functional nose models (box models) and anatomically exact models of the nose. Therefore, septal perforations of different sizes and localisations were studied in straight and deviated nasal septa. Results and Conclusions: It could be seen that the localisation of the perforation has no impact on the flow pattern. In large septal perforations, the air jet collides with the posterior edge of the perforation and disintegrates turbulently. Since airflow is physiologically turbulent in the posterior part of the nose, posterior perforations do not cause clinical complaints. The inspiratory whistling sound during respiration is based on the principle of a lip whistle. Large perforations do not cause a whistling sound. The necessary high flow velocity needed in large perforations is usually not achievable.

LRFM enables an assessment of temporary nasal obstruction as well as physiological and pathological fluctuations in the nasal cycle. Especially in cases in which traditional rhinological diagnostic tools are unsatisfying, the enhanced diagnostic quality of LRFM appears to be a promising supplement to the currently available rhinological monitoring methods.

Background: Especially to young examiners, the interpretation of rhinometric findings seems to be difficult. In order to understand rhinometric assessments precisely, knowledge of airflow behavior in the nose is necessary. We therefore investigated the influence of nasal concha surgery on acoustic rhinometry and rhinoresistometry in a model. Method: Six nose models were examined with acoustic rhinometry and rhinoresistometry, each of these models with its lateral wall altered to represent various conditions after nasal concha surgery. Besides, all models were rinsed with water and the flow was visualized for observation. Results and Conclusions: The normal nose presented an even flow distribution over the entire nasal cavity. After nasal concha resection, though, an unfavorable flow course and a strong increase in turbulence were seen. Additionally, flow resistance decreased considerably. In the model with general lateral wall hyperplasia, reduction of the inferior and even of the middle nasal concha showed good functional results. The model revealed a good correlation between the result of flow observation and findings in acoustic rhinometry and rhinoresistometry. Both methods complement one another in their diagnostic outcome.

Background: The nasal septal deviation is a common cause of nasal obstruction. On the other hand, many septal deviations are asymptomatic. It seems a physiological adaptation occurs on both sides. Septal deviation leads to internal nasal asymmetry, which in turn causes compensatory change in turbinate morphology (e.g. turbinate hypertrophy respectively hypotrophy). This mechanism is investigated with the help of fluid dynamic experiments and functional rhinologic diagnostics. Methods: Functional models of the nose (modified Mink’s boxes) were used and assessment was made by acoustic rhinometry and rhinoresistometry, followed by flow dynamic investigations. Septal deviations of varying position, together with turbinates of differing grades of hypertrophy, were simulated and assessed. Results and Conclusions: We observed in models of septal deviation an increase in flow resistance on the ipsilateral side as a result of friction of flow particles in the narrowing. Furthermore, on the opposite side of the deviation, the enlargement of the stream channel did not generally lead to a reduction in flow resistance, but rather to a ‘dead space’, where only a slow-circling eddy was observed. This eddy causes an increase in turbulence. In vivo turbinate hypertrophy occurs to fill this dead space, thereby reducing turbulent flow without a significant increase in resistance. In cases of moderate septal deviation, compensatory mechanisms of the turbinates can lead to a normalization of nasal airflow and surgical therapy would not be indicated. Deviations in the anterior part of the septum seem to be more symptomatic, because the mechanism is missing and due to the physiological narrowing of the nasal isthmus. To differ between physiologic and pathologic deviation, functional diagnostics are needed.