BACKGROUND Among women presenting with de novo stage IV breast cancer, 35% to 60% undergo local therapy, presumably to avoid uncontrolled chest wall disease. Several studies suggest that resection of the primary tumor may prolong survival, but chest wall outcome data are notably lacking. The authors reviewed chest wall status, time to first progression (TTFP), and overall survival (OS) in this group of women. METHODS Women presenting at the Lynn Sage Breast Center (1995‐2005) with an intact primary tumor and stage IV breast cancer or postoperative diagnosis of distant metastases were identified. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for relevant covariates, were used to examine associations between surgical treatment and chest wall status, TTFP, and OS. RESULTS Of 111 eligible women, 47 (42%) underwent early resection of the primary tumor. Chest wall status was available for 103 women. Local control was maintained in 36 of 44 (82%) patients in the surgical group versus 20 of 59 (34%) patients without surgery (P = .001). TTFP was prolonged in the surgical group (adjusted hazards ratio [HR], 0.493; P = .015). The adjusted HR for OS in the surgical group was 0.798 (P = .520). Chest wall control was associated with improved OS regardless of whether surgical resection of the tumor was performed (HR, 0.415; P < .0002). CONCLUSIONS These data support the notion that improved local control may play a role in improving outcomes in women with stage IV breast cancer, and resection of in‐breast tumors can help to achieve this. A randomized trial is needed to rule out selection bias as an explanation for these findings. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.
SUMMARY BackgroundThe colon shows frequent eosinophilic infiltration in allergic proctocolitis of infants, whereas in adults, eosinophilic infiltration of the colon is less defined and may be found in different conditions including drug-induced colitis, even though the pathological findings are often inconsistent.
CD80 and CD86 expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells interact with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 [CTLA-4 (CD152)] expressed on activated T cells and mediate critical T cell inhibitory signals. CD80 and CD86 are type I glycoproteins, and are made up of two extracellular (EC) Ig-like domains-a transmembrane region and a cytoplasmic tail. The N-terminal (V domain) and membrane-proximal (C) domains share homology with the variable region (V) and the constant region (C) of Ig respectively. Co-crystallographic structures of both CD80 and CD86 bound to CTLA-4 indicate that there is no direct interaction of the C domain of either CD80 or CD86 with the CTLA-4. In contrast, previous mutagenesis studies have identified specific amino acids within the C domain of CD80 that are critical for CTLA-4 binding. To further understand the importance of C domains in the functioning of CD80 and CD86, we constructed chimeric human CD80 and CD86 molecules by swapping their respective C domains, and tested their ability to stimulate T cells. A Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line expressing CD86 activated murine T cells. In contrast, CHO cells expressing either CD80 or a chimeric construct of the CD86 V domain and the CD80 C domain showed a significantly reduced activation. Our studies further demonstrated that the decreased activation by cells expressing the CD80 or a chimera containing CD80 C domain is most likely due to enhanced CTLA-4 binding. From these results we conclude that C domains play a critical, albeit indirect, role in determining CTLA-4 binding affinities and co-stimulatory properties.
Addition of intermittent or continuous linsitinib with paclitaxel did not improve outcomes in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer compared with paclitaxel alone.
TPS3647 Background: Nectin-4, a transmembrane cell adhesion protein, is highly expressed in urothelial carcinoma (UC), breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and gastroesophageal cancers (GEC); targeting Nectin-4 on these tumors may provide a novel treatment approach. Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an investigational human monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate, binds to Nectin-4 and upon internalization releases MMAE resulting in cell cycle arrest and cell death. Recently, EV received accelerated approval by the FDA for the treatment of adults with locally advanced/metastatic UC who previously received a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor, and a platinum-containing chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant, locally advanced or metastatic setting. Use of EV in this study is investigational. Methods: This open-label phase 2 study (NCT04225117) will assess the efficacy and safety/tolerability of EV in patients (pts) with previously treated locally advanced/metastatic malignant solid tumors. Adult pts (~240) with histologically or cytologically confirmed disease and an ECOG ≤1 will be enrolled into 1 of 6 tumor-specific cohorts (Table), with ~40 pts each. While Nectin-4 expression is not required for enrollment, it is being tested retrospectively. Patients with active CNS metastases, grade ≥2 preexisting sensory or motor neuropathy, grade ≥3 immunotherapy-related hypothyroidism or panhypopituitarism, ongoing grade >3 immunotherapy-related AEs requiring high-dose steroids, or a history of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus within 3 months of the study will be excluded. All pts will receive EV 1.25 mg/kg IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle until treatment discontinuation criteria are met; dose reductions/interruptions will be permitted. For all cohorts, the primary endpoint is investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1); secondary endpoints include duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free and overall survival, and safety/tolerability of EV. This study is recruiting as of February 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04225117 . [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.