The wish list of clinicians for the modulation of FRAX is large, but in many instances, these wishes cannot presently be fulfilled; however, an explanation and understanding of the reasons may be helpful in translating the information provided by FRAX into clinical practice.

SummaryOdanacatib is a cathepsin K inhibitor investigated for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Phase 2 data indicate that 50 mg once weekly inhibits bone resorption and increases bone mineral density, with only a transient decrease in bone formation. We describe the background, design and participant characteristics for the phase 3 registration trial.IntroductionOdanacatib (ODN) is a selective cathepsin K inhibitor being evaluated for the treatment of osteoporosis. In a phase 2 trial, ODN 50 mg once weekly reduced bone resorption while preserving bone formation and progressively increased BMD over 5 years. We describe the phase III Long-Term ODN Fracture Trial (LOFT), an event-driven, randomized, blinded placebo-controlled trial, with preplanned interim analyses to permit early termination if significant fracture risk reduction was demonstrated. An extension was planned, with participants remaining on their randomized treatment for up to 5 years, then transitioning to open-label ODN.MethodsThe three primary outcomes were radiologically determined vertebral, hip, and clinical non-vertebral fractures. Secondary end points included clinical vertebral fractures, BMD, bone turnover markers, and safety and tolerability, including bone histology. Participants were women, 65 years or older, with a BMD T-score ≤−2.5 at the total hip (TH) or femoral neck (FN) or with a prior radiographic vertebral fracture and a T-score ≤−1.5 at the TH or FN. They were randomized to ODN or placebo tablets. All received weekly vitamin D3 (5600 international units (IU)) and daily calcium supplements as needed to ensure a daily intake of approximately 1200 mg.ResultsAltogether, 16,713 participants were randomized at 387 centers. After a planned interim analysis, an independent data monitoring committee recommended that the study be stopped early due to robust efficacy and a favorable benefit/risk profile. Following the base study closeout, 8256 participants entered the study extension.ConclusionsThis report details the background and study design of this fracture end point trial and describes the baseline characteristics of its participants.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2944-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in perimenopausal women, and to assess determinants of low bone mineral density (BMD). All women born between 1941 and 1947 (aged between 46 and 54 years) living in the city of Eindhoven were invited to participate in the study: 5896 white Dutch women, representing 73% of the total number of Dutch women in this age group, were studied. Of these, 24% were using estrogen preparations and 19% had undergone hysterectomy, with or without oophorectomy. All women were interviewed and bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteopenia and osteoporosis were defined according to the criteria proposed by a WHO working group. In the population studied the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis was 27.3% and 4.1%, respectively. With progression from premenopause to menopause, the prevalence of osteoporosis increased from 0.4% to 12.7%, and that of osteopenia from 14.5% to 42.8%. An increased risk for low BMD (osteopenia and osteoporosis) was associated with age, menopausal status and smoking, while alcohol consumption, high body mass index (BMI) and use of estrogens had a protective effect. This study of a large population-based cohort of perimenopausal women revealed a high prevalence of low bone mass and, therefore, a higher risk for osteoporotic fractures. The data further suggest that, when issues on the long-term efficacy and safety of preventive treatments are resolved, it may be possible to identify women at higher risk who are most likely to benefit from screening strategies.

SummaryWe evaluated the relationship between bone material strength index (BMSi) and fragility fractures, including vertebral fractures. Our data showed that BMSi is low in all fracture patients with low bone mass, independently of whether patients sustained a vertebral or a non-vertebral fracture.IntroductionImpact microindentation (IMI) is a new technique for the measurement of tissue level properties of cortical bone in vivo. Previous studies showed an association between BMSi and non-vertebral fractures, but an association with vertebral fractures is still being debated. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the relationship between BMSi and different types of fragility fractures, including vertebral fractures.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, we measured BMSi in patients of both sexes with different types of fragility fractures and low bone mass with the IMI method using the Osteoprobe®. Vertebral fractures were diagnosed and graded on lateral spine radiographs.ResultsA total of 132 patients were included in the study, of whom 101 patients (65 women) had sustained a low energy fracture and 31 (mean age 57.7 ± 9.9 years) had no history or radiological evidence for a fracture. Of the fracture patients, 53 (mean age 62.8 ± 8.3 years) had only non-vertebral fractures (VF−/Fx+), 34 (mean age 62.8 ± 9.9 years) had vertebral and non-vertebral fractures (VF+/Fx+), and 14 (mean age 64.7 ± 9.3 years) had only vertebral fractures (VF+/Fx−). BMSi values, adjusted for age and BMD, were similar for all three groups of fracture patients (78.9 ± 0.7, 78.3 ± 0.9, and 78.4 ± 1.4, respectively; p = 0.866). BMSi values were not associated with number or severity of vertebral fractures.ConclusionOur data demonstrate that BMSi is low in fracture patients with low bone mass, irrespective of whether they sustained a vertebral fracture or a non-vertebral fracture.

No abstract