The majority of breast cancer research is conducted using established breast cancer cell lines as in vitro models. An alternative is to use cultures established from primary breast tumours. Here, we discuss the pros and cons of using both of these models in translational breast cancer research.

Two oestrogen receptors, ER alpha and ER beta, exist. While much is known about ER alpha, the role of ER beta is still undefined, especially at the protein level. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of seven ER beta antibodies (14C8, 8D5, PAI313, PPG5/10, N19, 9.88, and D7N) raised against different domains of ER beta in three commonly used laboratory applications, namely immunohistochemistry, western blot, and flow cytometry, using human breast material. For immunohistochemical analysis of frozen material, PAI313 and D7N gave stronger and more specific signals than 14C8, 8D5, and PPG5/10. In paraffin sections, 14C8, closely followed by PPG5/10, gave by far the most superior nuclear immunoreactivity, compared with the other antibodies tested. In general, flow cytometry results mirrored the immunohistochemistry data for paraffin sections, with antibodies ranked 14C8 > 8D5> or = PAI-313 > PPG5/10 >D7N. For western blotting, 8D5 and D7N yielded the strongest and most consistent bands, with weaker bands seen with the others. It is concluded that ER beta protein can be detected using specific antibodies. However, there is considerable variation between the specificity and application of these antibodies, highlighting the fact that careful optimization is required when selecting an antibody for use in a particular laboratory technique.

ER subtypes have distinct distribution patterns in the normal mammary gland. The widespread distribution of ER beta suggests that it may be the dominant ER in the mammary gland where it may be acting as a natural suppressor.

Women in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families have up to a 71% lifetime risk for developing endometrial cancer (EC). This compares to the female lifetime risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) in HNPCC of 60%. The basis of HNPCC is an inherited mutation in a mismatch repair gene (MMR). Aspirin and COX2 inhibitors seem to have a chemoprotective effect on CRC in the general population and are the subject of prospective clinical studies in patients at high risk for CRC including HNPCC. There is no evidence that these agents have any protective effect against EC in the general population. This study investigated the effect of aspirin and a COX2 inhibitor (rofecoxib) on an HNPCC EC cell line model (Ishikawa) by assessing the effect on proliferation, apoptosis, the cell cycle, and MMR gene expression. Aspirin inhibits EC cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis and changes in the cell cycle. This effect is not mediated by changes in MMR gene (hMSH2) expression as assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Rofecoxib inhibits EC cell proliferation; this did not appear to be mediated by induction of apoptosis, by alterations of the cell cycle, or by changes in MMR gene expression.